Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Early vs Late Gas tanks, Is one better than the other?
PeeGreen 914
post Oct 17 2007, 12:26 PM
Post #1


Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,219
Joined: 21-September 06
From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett
Member No.: 6,884
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



So I know that after '73 the tanks had an overflow/ evap thing on top. Is this better or worse than the older?

And does anyone have the fill neck off an early tank they are not using. I think I would rather have that unless someone can convince me the '74 tanks top are better.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 5)
davep
post Oct 17 2007, 01:09 PM
Post #2


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,152
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



I think all but a few very early 1970 cars have the overflow. About the only change I recall is the later plastic fume chamber replaced the steel unit about 1975.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PeeGreen 914
post Oct 17 2007, 01:23 PM
Post #3


Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,219
Joined: 21-September 06
From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett
Member No.: 6,884
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Must have been late '74 as mine has the plastic. I would like to have to metal one though.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TravisNeff
post Oct 17 2007, 01:24 PM
Post #4


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 20-March 03
From: Mesa, AZ
Member No.: 447
Region Association: Southwest Region



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rhodyguy
post Oct 17 2007, 06:40 PM
Post #5


Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out.
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 22,090
Joined: 2-March 03
From: Orion's Bell. The BELL!
Member No.: 378
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



also the provission for the charcol canister moving to the engine compartment from the tank top must have occured in mid year 74'. recently had 2 74's in the driveway. the 2 routing lines that run up the drivers long, and the 2 small pipes that come thru under the cowl did not exsist in one of them. the canister in the ec tank did not have the mounting bracket on top of the tank.

k
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brett W
post Oct 18 2007, 09:43 AM
Post #6


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,856
Joined: 17-September 03
From: huntsville, al
Member No.: 1,169
Region Association: None



I like the screw on top provided by the later tanks. It seems to seal better than the eraly tanks. With a full tank on my 73 I would always have a gas smell and some leakage around the cap. Even with a new cap.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 02:21 AM