motorcycle engine powered 914? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
motorcycle engine powered 914? |
WolfR32 |
Mar 19 2008, 01:49 AM
Post
#1
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 19-September 07 From: Newbury Park, CA Member No.: 8,130 Region Association: Southern California |
Has anyone seen one? Is it even possible?
|
dug |
Mar 19 2008, 04:45 AM
Post
#2
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 182 Joined: 26-December 06 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 7,382 Region Association: Northern California |
I have thought about it. Need to get the weight down as much as possible.
Hayabusa engine will run you about $3k. There are several options for differentials with limited slip and reverse in the 2-3k range. DIY no-reverse solutions are possible. Pushing a 914 out of parking spots is no big deal:) See this thread: http://www.minibuggy.net/modules.php?name=...topic&t=261 Questions I don't have answers to: How much less will the car weigh because of the engine swap? How long will the transmission/clutch last with 1500-2000 lbs to haul around? How light can you get the 914 with fiberglass fenders/hoods/bumpers/smaller gas tank/etc? Would the drivability suck after all that $ and work? Mmmmm, 13,000 rpm. The engine I'd really like to see in a 914 is this hayabusa/powertec 2.6 V8: http://www.powertecracing.com/ cheers, dug |
Root_Werks |
Mar 19 2008, 07:44 AM
Post
#3
|
Village Idiot Group: Members Posts: 8,331 Joined: 25-May 04 From: About 5NM from Canada Member No.: 2,105 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
Anythings possible with $$$ of course. Maybe put your sights on a Gold Wing engine? I know the trany's have reverse. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
|
rick 918-S |
Mar 19 2008, 08:00 AM
Post
#4
|
Hey nice rack! -Celette Group: Members Posts: 20,473 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Now in Superior WI Member No.: 43 Region Association: Northstar Region |
Not enough torque. I'm working on the plans for a cycle powered vehicle but it will be scratch built. All light 4130 bird cage tubing and aluminum or glas skin.
Your asking that cycle engine to move a tremedous amount of weight compared to it's design intent. It would probably work fine until you tried to pull a hill and had to shift down a couple of clicks. First the stress on the engine would require alot more throttle, ie. more fuel. And that would likely be the end of the clutch. |
yenningComity |
Mar 19 2008, 08:53 AM
Post
#5
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 38 Joined: 27-August 07 From: Carmel Indiana Member No.: 8,047 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
Ive seen old mini coopers with them, but for a 914 it would need to be gutted. You would probably need fiberglass everything to boot.
|
BIGKAT_83 |
Mar 19 2008, 09:09 AM
Post
#6
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,798 Joined: 25-January 03 From: Way down south Bogart,GA Member No.: 194 Region Association: South East States |
I look at a 1800cc goldwing engine as a conversion a couple of years ago. IIRC the max torque output was way higher that a 2L T4 engine at a even lower rpm.
Do a search for a Ultima Kit car with 2 Busa engines,one in the front and one in the rear all wheel drive,ran over 200mph and low 3 sec 0-60 times. |
yenningComity |
Mar 19 2008, 09:25 AM
Post
#7
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 38 Joined: 27-August 07 From: Carmel Indiana Member No.: 8,047 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
I don't doubt that the engine isn't fully capable of it, but the transmission? This idea has been discussed for the mr2 mki's quite a bit which weigh about what our cars do, and the answer was no due to the transmission issue.
|
ericread |
Mar 19 2008, 02:30 PM
Post
#8
|
The Viper Blue 914 Group: Members Posts: 2,177 Joined: 7-December 07 From: Irvine, CA (The OC) Member No.: 8,432 Region Association: Southern California |
Just think... Then we can add a sidecar!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif) I wonder how this would affect the AX classification?
|
So.Cal.914 |
Mar 19 2008, 02:37 PM
Post
#9
|
"...And it has a front trunk too." Group: Members Posts: 6,588 Joined: 15-February 04 From: Low Desert, CA./ Hills of N.J. Member No.: 1,658 Region Association: None |
Just think... Then we can add a sidecar!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif) I wonder how this would affect the AX classification? Wouldn't that put you in the 'Outrigger' class? |
SirAndy |
Mar 19 2008, 03:24 PM
Post
#10
|
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,669 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
Has anyone seen one? Is it even possible? no torque to speak of anywhere in the rpm range to move those 2300 lbs around ... so, unless you want a total slug that sounds like a sewing machine on steroids ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif) Andy |
swl |
Mar 19 2008, 05:07 PM
Post
#11
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,409 Joined: 7-August 05 From: Kingston,On,Canada Member No.: 4,550 Region Association: Canada |
Speaking of a sewing machine on steroids...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=3h8KdtuBBLM |
kart54 |
Mar 19 2008, 06:03 PM
Post
#12
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 544 Joined: 27-January 05 From: Ventura, California Member No.: 3,520 |
Actually not a terrible idea. Several bike engines have more torque and more horsepower than a stock 2.0.
If I had a choice it would be the new Supercharged direct injected sea doo engine. 225 horsepower and 180 pounds of torque in a package that weighs substantially less than a porsche 4 banger. Shouldn't be to difficult to fab up a bellhousing and flywheel to mate it to the 901 transaxle and all the goodies are on the engine already in a compact package Kart54 |
Sparky |
Mar 19 2008, 06:40 PM
Post
#13
|
Mahna Mahna! Group: Members Posts: 1,134 Joined: 21-June 03 From: Spencer, MA Member No.: 847 |
Isn't that actually the Aprilla 1000cc? They are using it in the Can-Am Spyder.
Actually not a terrible idea. Several bike engines have more torque and more horsepower than a stock 2.0. If I had a choice it would be the new Supercharged direct injected sea doo engine. 225 horsepower and 180 pounds of torque in a package that weighs substantially less than a porsche 4 banger. Shouldn't be to difficult to fab up a bellhousing and flywheel to mate it to the 901 transaxle and all the goodies are on the engine already in a compact package Kart54 |
purple |
Mar 19 2008, 10:29 PM
Post
#14
|
Pigeon feeders attract me Group: Members Posts: 938 Joined: 24-July 07 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 7,942 Region Association: None |
All torque issues aside, I remember seeing a review of those trike cars with the one wheel in the back and two in front.
The t-rex http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38TFetQAe2o i seem to recall him saying that it's hard to drive because the clutch is meant to be operated with your hand, which has very fine control, where you have to operate that one with your left food, which is not even close in fine control. I think THAT would be more of an issue on a daily basis more than anything else. Neat idea...if you could use it on the 901 tranny |
HillKing |
Mar 19 2008, 11:05 PM
Post
#15
|
Self taught incompetent Group: Members Posts: 62 Joined: 11-January 08 From: Cody, Wyoming Member No.: 8,563 Region Association: None |
Couple of bad ass Harley engines!!!
Would sound cool too. |
purple |
Mar 20 2008, 05:37 AM
Post
#16
|
Pigeon feeders attract me Group: Members Posts: 938 Joined: 24-July 07 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 7,942 Region Association: None |
|
HeavyHeavy |
Mar 20 2008, 10:53 AM
Post
#17
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 62 Joined: 7-June 06 From: Albuquerque Member No.: 6,177 |
|
Rand |
Mar 20 2008, 11:08 AM
Post
#18
|
Cross Member Group: Members Posts: 7,409 Joined: 8-February 05 From: OR Member No.: 3,573 Region Association: None |
If you built a TIV as high strung as these HO motorcycle engines, imagine the power you could have.
Even if the bike engine has adequate torque, my biggest concern would be breaking stuff. Motors and transmissions that are physically that small are designed to power bikes that weigh a fraction of what our car weighs. You suddenly add several times the weight to them, something is going to break. There's a reason bigger vehicles have bigger drivetrains. The parts need to be beefy enough to deal with the forces it takes to get that much weight moving quickly. |
LarryR |
Mar 20 2008, 08:31 PM
Post
#19
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 929 Joined: 15-March 07 From: E. Bay Area, N. California Member No.: 7,604 |
I think this is extremely interesting. a 914 with a motorcyle engine would not weigh anywhere near 2300 pounds. I bet if you went with carbon fiber lids, race glass, carbon fiber seats, light weight carpet kit and a motorcycle engine you would be looking at somewhere around 1250 - 1500 pounds. A big honda goldwing must weigh at least 800 pounds.
I just think about the radicals that I have seen that absolutely fly with motorcycle engines. They sound incredible too. Hope someone tries it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) |
Rand |
Mar 20 2008, 09:16 PM
Post
#20
|
Cross Member Group: Members Posts: 7,409 Joined: 8-February 05 From: OR Member No.: 3,573 Region Association: None |
Unless you chop like URY, you won't get a 914 that light. It would be tough to get a street legal 914 under 1800lbs. And that extra 1000++ lbs is what's going to take it's toll on the motorcycle drivetrain.
But don't get me wrong. Let me be clear about this: I ENCOURAGE YOU TO DO IT!!!!! Woot. Do it! Show us! |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 08:13 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |