Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> OT: Better handling characteristics mid-engine or AWD ?, Advantages and Disadvantages of each ?
levonfarra
post Jul 23 2008, 10:11 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 173
Joined: 10-February 07
From: Encino, CA
Member No.: 7,521
Region Association: None



I am just tossing ideas around for what my next daily driver should be. I am considering WRX or MR2 Spyder what would handle better?

Best,

Levon
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 8)
Zundfolge
post Jul 23 2008, 10:45 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 847
Joined: 12-August 07
From: Colorado Springs
Member No.: 7,994
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Well this is kind of an apples to oranges comparison, but according to Motor Trend, the 2008 Impreza WRX STI pulled .91g on the skid pad

The 2003 MR2 Spyder pulled .88g

Even so, I bet the MR2 Spyder is probably going to be more fun to drive.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
i love porsche
post Jul 24 2008, 02:59 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,547
Joined: 6-May 04
From: Nutley, NJ
Member No.: 2,030
Region Association: North East States



there is more to compare between those cars than just the fact that one is AWD and one is a Midship Runabout

the MR2 is alot smaller and has much smaller tires, also lighter, more like a 914

the WRX is more powerful, and heavier, the AWD does make it handle well, and it is a better choice for a year round car, it also is going to have larger tires which will provide more grip

i would have to agree that the fun factor lies with the MR2, but practicality lies with the WRX. how tall are you? if youre around 6' getting in an MR2 is a SQUEEZE. i used to valet, believe me

test drive both, then you shouldnt even have to ask
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Jul 24 2008, 03:23 PM
Post #4


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,331
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Audi TT Quatro. Look better in my opinion. We have one in our family, always get 28-29mpg averaged. Handles our crappy public roads great as well.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Jul 24 2008, 07:23 PM
Post #5


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



I have a 93 Mr.2 turbo. with about 160K miles on it & everything works including the original turbo. Failures consist of one rear wheel bearing.....thas it. It's a Toyoda, dude.

It's a bit more butt heavy that a 914....rear break away does get telegraphed more better.
I wouldn't buy one older than 93. The earlier Gen 2 ones could get downright evil in the handling department. If you can find an all stock one (like mine).....gud luck.....buy it.....mine ain't F/S, BTW. Most have been "modified" by twits.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Jul 24 2008, 07:31 PM
Post #6


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,968
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



When is some one going to AWD a 914? I don't mean some jacked up POS. Do a decent job of it using P-car parts. We've done everything else to these rust buckets.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Jul 24 2008, 07:39 PM
Post #7


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,669
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(levonfarra @ Jul 23 2008, 08:11 PM) *

Better handling characteristics mid-engine or AWD ?

Yes ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Zundfolge
post Jul 24 2008, 11:02 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 847
Joined: 12-August 07
From: Colorado Springs
Member No.: 7,994
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(URY914 @ Jul 24 2008, 07:31 PM) *

When is some one going to AWD a 914? I don't mean some jacked up POS. Do a decent job of it using P-car parts. We've done everything else to these rust buckets.


Would be interesting to see someone modify a C4 drivetrain to a 914.

Of course its going to end up being a rear engine 914 and no longer a mid engine (kinda hard to route power from both front and back of the motor, or run a drive shaft from the transaxle AROUND the motor to the front dif.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Jul 24 2008, 11:37 PM
Post #9


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,669
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



looks like there should be enough room in there for a 2nd transmission ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


btw. the schematic is looking at the car from the underside, hence the steering column on the top ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif) Andy



Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 03:22 PM