Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> '73 2.0 question
NOSLIWW
post Sep 23 2008, 02:07 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 18-September 08
From: Mississippi
Member No.: 9,562
Region Association: None



Just bought my first. Numbers reflect car and engine are 73. It's a 2.0 with dual webers. Engine number is GA0000282. Are the webers a retrofit? Or was it an available option back then?

General consensus? What's better for more power? The dual Webers or with fuel injection?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 19)
Demick
post Sep 23 2008, 02:10 PM
Post #2


Ernie made me do it!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,312
Joined: 6-February 03
From: Pleasanton, CA
Member No.: 257



All 4 cyl cars came with fuel injection. So the carbs are aftermarket.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Demick
post Sep 23 2008, 02:10 PM
Post #3


Ernie made me do it!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,312
Joined: 6-February 03
From: Pleasanton, CA
Member No.: 257



Oh, and...... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TravisNeff
post Sep 23 2008, 02:10 PM
Post #4


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 20-March 03
From: Mesa, AZ
Member No.: 447
Region Association: Southwest Region



retrofitted. all 914's were fuel injected. Well, except for the European 1.8's which came carbs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TheCabinetmaker
post Sep 23 2008, 02:17 PM
Post #5


I drive my car everyday
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,301
Joined: 8-May 03
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Member No.: 666



Welcome to the club NOSLIWW

Travis, that was my understanding too till I was corrected by the Cap'n. He said they were all injected.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TravisNeff
post Sep 23 2008, 02:32 PM
Post #6


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 20-March 03
From: Mesa, AZ
Member No.: 447
Region Association: Southwest Region



nope, the European 1.8's did come with carbs, check a haynes manual and you'll see em'
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Sep 23 2008, 02:41 PM
Post #7


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



QUOTE(vsg914 @ Sep 23 2008, 01:17 PM) *

Welcome to the club NOSLIWW

Travis, that was my understanding too till I was corrected by the Cap'n. He said they were all injected.


I don't remember saying that, but I'm old and my brain is feeble. European 1974 1.8s, for sure, had 2 crappy Solex single throat carbs with the idle circuit for both in the right carb. Throttle plates wore out in about 30K miles, accelerator pump jets fell into the intake ports and they were difficult to tune. I dunno if they had 'em in 1975. All USA version 914/4s were equipped with EFI. The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TheCabinetmaker
post Sep 23 2008, 08:42 PM
Post #8


I drive my car everyday
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,301
Joined: 8-May 03
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Member No.: 666



QUOTE(Cap'n Krusty @ Sep 23 2008, 03:41 PM) *

QUOTE(vsg914 @ Sep 23 2008, 01:17 PM) *

Welcome to the club NOSLIWW

Travis, that was my understanding too till I was corrected by the Cap'n. He said they were all injected.


I don't remember saying that, but I'm old and my brain is feeble. European 1974 1.8s, for sure, had 2 crappy Solex single throat carbs with the idle circuit for both in the right carb. Throttle plates wore out in about 30K miles, accelerator pump jets fell into the intake ports and they were difficult to tune. I dunno if they had 'em in 1975. All USA version 914/4s were equipped with EFI. The Cap'n

Hell, i'm old too. Maybe I just dreamed it? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dbgriffith75
post Sep 24 2008, 11:07 AM
Post #9


TheGrif
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 25-July 07
From: Iowa, USA
Member No.: 7,945
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE
European 1974 1.8s, for sure, had 2 crappy Solex single throat carbs with the idle circuit for both in the right carb. Throttle plates wore out in about 30K miles, accelerator pump jets fell into the intake ports and they were difficult to tune. I dunno if they had 'em in 1975. All USA version 914/4s were equipped with EFI. The Cap'n


Hmm.... maybe I've had some misconceptions about my motor then... because that's what I've got for carbs on mine- two little single barrel Solex carbs.

So either the carbs came from a euro motor and this one was still converted.... or it was a euro motor that was installed in my teener...

Hmmm....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Sep 24 2008, 11:27 AM
Post #10


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,331
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Nah, someone just tossed on some little carbs was all. If your car runs great and you don't have a ton of money, just leave it be. If you have money and want to do what most of us do, spend it, put bigger carbs on it or convert back to FI. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
estwing
post Sep 24 2008, 08:04 PM
Post #11


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 25-June 04
From: NW Arkansas
Member No.: 2,254



QUOTE(NOSLIWW @ Sep 23 2008, 12:07 PM) *

Just bought my first. Numbers reflect car and engine are 73. It's a 2.0 with dual webers. Engine number is GA0000282. Are the webers a retrofit? Or was it an available option back then?

General consensus? What's better for more power? The dual Webers or with fuel injection?



Doesn't this engine number indicate it's a 1970 model?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Sep 24 2008, 09:40 PM
Post #12


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,151
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(estwing @ Sep 24 2008, 06:04 PM) *

QUOTE(NOSLIWW @ Sep 23 2008, 12:07 PM) *

Engine number is GA0000282.

Doesn't this engine number indicate it's a 1970 model?

GA indicates a 2.0, and 0000282 indicates a very early 73
The GA engine was introduced in Aug 1973.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Sep 24 2008, 09:42 PM
Post #13


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,151
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(dbgriffith75 @ Sep 24 2008, 09:07 AM) *

Hmm.... maybe I've had some misconceptions about my motor then... because that's what I've got for carbs on mine- two little single barrel Solex carbs.

The engine number will indicate the engine type; AN is the carbed 1.8
http://www.914world.com/specs/engnumbs.php
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dw914er
post Sep 24 2008, 09:48 PM
Post #14


Planning Cities
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,364
Joined: 1-March 08
From: Yucaipa, CA
Member No.: 8,763
Region Association: Southern California



motor is 73. No 2.0 4's back in 70 anyways for the 914. All 914-4s were fuel injected cept the euro 1.8's, which were the solex carbs.

Since you have a 2.0 with weber carbs, its been converted.


to your question about which is better, it really depends. The stock fi limits the amount of power you can get out of the car (if you make a bigger type 4 like one of raby's kits, youll want carbs) but the fi typically is going to run better stock. Also, the stock fi in working order will suggest the car was better taken care of.

Me, I like the FI, and havn't had too many issues with it


and welcome to 914world!!!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
estwing
post Sep 25 2008, 07:29 PM
Post #15


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 25-June 04
From: NW Arkansas
Member No.: 2,254



Sorry, I thought the fourth digit indicated the year. I'll have to check my Haynes manual again.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
NOSLIWW
post Sep 26 2008, 11:20 PM
Post #16


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 18-September 08
From: Mississippi
Member No.: 9,562
Region Association: None



Thanks to eveyone for their input!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post Sep 26 2008, 11:56 PM
Post #17


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,119
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(dw914er @ Sep 24 2008, 08:48 PM) *


to your question about which is better, it really depends. The stock fi limits the amount of power you can get out of the car (if you make a bigger type 4 like one of raby's kits, youll want carbs) but the fi typically is going to run better stock. Also, the stock fi in working order will suggest the car was better taken care of.



Thats debatable.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dw914er
post Sep 27 2008, 12:24 AM
Post #18


Planning Cities
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,364
Joined: 1-March 08
From: Yucaipa, CA
Member No.: 8,763
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(rdauenhauer @ Sep 26 2008, 10:56 PM) *

QUOTE(dw914er @ Sep 24 2008, 08:48 PM) *


to your question about which is better, it really depends. The stock fi limits the amount of power you can get out of the car (if you make a bigger type 4 like one of raby's kits, youll want carbs) but the fi typically is going to run better stock. Also, the stock fi in working order will suggest the car was better taken care of.



Thats debatable.


true, but I have yet to see a 914 with a beefed up type 4 with the stock fi. If its modified then thats another story.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sww914
post Sep 27 2008, 03:40 AM
Post #19


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,439
Joined: 4-June 06
Member No.: 6,146
Region Association: None



What's a Raby?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dw914er
post Sep 27 2008, 03:47 AM
Post #20


Planning Cities
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,364
Joined: 1-March 08
From: Yucaipa, CA
Member No.: 8,763
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(sww914 @ Sep 27 2008, 02:40 AM) *

What's a Raby?


Serious Steve?
I guess to be more correct, my "raby" I referred to is one of Jake Raby's "massIVe" type 4 motors he sells. I used it as an example of a beefed up type 4. Even your race car has the carbs on it; I havn't seen a high powered type 4 run the stock fi.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2024 - 12:15 AM