 1.7L FI on 2.0L, trying to figure out what the PO did ???? |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| thompson-mfr |
 Jun 17 2009, 03:28 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Thompson, Ryan  Group: Members Posts: 198 Joined: 30-September 08 From: Silverton, OR Member No.: 9,598 Region Association: Pacific Northwest  |
Calling all FI genius'
I have a 74 2.0 factory FI (or so I thought) with green 2.0 injectors. I know the motor is 2.0 factory no question there. Can't get the full Bosch part number off of the FI Brain. Not stamped in the back metal like others I have see. It has a sticker that is partly worn off. The part of the sticker still there is really bright and BROWN in color. The MPS is a 0 280 100 019 022 906 051A which I have heard could be a 1.7l replacement or from a 411/412 or even type 3 ??????? THE QUESTION: Has anyone heard of using a 1.7L D-jet setup on a 2.0? The MPS may have been adjusted as the stuff on the aduster looks tampered with. Just removed the FI brain and wires to check the wire integrity. I noticed that the thermo time switch harness had been extended (PO used the existing wire connector then plugged into that with wire and used another connector to extend it. My fuel pressure, up until recently when I checked it, has always been a little low like 26-27lbs. Now adjusted to 29-30lbs |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies(1 - 4)
| SLITS |
Jun 17 2009, 04:19 PM
Post
#2
|
|
"This Utah shit is HARSH!" Group: Benefactors Posts: 13,602 Joined: 22-February 04 From: SoCal Mountains ... Member No.: 1,696 Region Association: None  |
0 280 100 019 = 10/69-07/71 1.7L enigne. Replacement for it was 0 280 100 049 which was used 07/72-10/73 1.7L engine.
Paul Banders indicates the the 049 can be used with the 043 / 044 (CU14X) ECU as OEM for '74 2.0L. Additionally, the 049 is used with the 052 (CU16X) as OEM for '75-'76 2.0L. Confused now? What I would read into this is that your 019 MPS with a 043/044/052 ECU would be fine for your 2.0L (which is what I used on a friend's '73 2.0L .... 052/049 with a 012 CHT. Runs beautifully .... |
|
|
|
| r_towle |
Jun 17 2009, 05:29 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Custom Member Group: Members Posts: 24,586 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Taxachusetts Member No.: 124 Region Association: North East States 
|
70-73 was the Djet system for the 1.7.
In 73 they offered the 2.0 liter, but did not upgrade the Djet. Instead you would have different injectors (green) a different CHT and a resistor, and that is it...It used the same ECU as the 73 1.7 unit, on some cars... At some point during the model year, they did replace the ECU with a 2.0 liter dedicated ECU. Rich |
|
|
|
| thompson-mfr |
Jun 17 2009, 05:30 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Thompson, Ryan Group: Members Posts: 198 Joined: 30-September 08 From: Silverton, OR Member No.: 9,598 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
QUOTE(SLITS @ Jun 17 2009, 03:19 PM)  0 280 100 019 = 10/69-07/71 1.7L enigne. Replacement for it was 0 280 100 049 which was used 07/72-10/73 1.7L engine. Paul Banders indicates the the 049 can be used with the 043 / 044 (CU14X) ECU as OEM for '74 2.0L. Additionally, the 049 is used with the 052 (CU16X) as OEM for '75-'76 2.0L. Confused now? What I would read into this is that your 019 MPS with a 043/044/052 ECU would be fine for your 2.0L (which is what I used on a friend's '73 2.0L .... 052/049 with a 012 CHT. Runs beautifully .... does this mean that the MPS 0 280 100 019 would need to be adjusted? It was my understanding that the 1.7L and 2.0 were indexed differently with the adjuster screw on the end. Don't exactly trust the PO's adjustment, if that is in fact what he did. If I understand SLITS correctly I don't have to adjust the MPS for my 2.0L as long as my ECU is correct version |
|
|
|
| orange914 |
Jun 17 2009, 07:20 PM
Post
#5
|
|
http://5starmediaworks.com/index.html Group: Members Posts: 3,371 Joined: 26-March 05 From: Ceres, California Member No.: 3,818 Region Association: Northern California |
QUOTE(r_towle @ Jun 17 2009, 03:29 PM) In 73 they offered the 2.0 liter, but did not upgrade the Djet. Rich if i'm not mistaken it was all basically upgraded to 2.0 D-jet except the m.p.s./ecu w/ inline cht resister... right? when i converted to 2.0 d-jet (from 73' 1.7) i went with 052 ecu (has decel feature that cuts fuel, helping mileage/emmisions w/o effecting power). along with the 012 cht and set 049? mps it runs great. mike |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th June 2024 - 03:10 PM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.