SDS VS MS, I would like to figure this one out?????? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
SDS VS MS, I would like to figure this one out?????? |
toon1 |
Mar 16 2008, 01:11 PM
Post
#41
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,849 Joined: 29-October 05 From: tracy,ca Member No.: 5,022 |
DISCLAIMER: This is not a thread to argue bash or to say yours is better than mine.
I would like to learn what the difference is! I am an MS user and happy with it, if SDS will fuel an engine better, I would like to find out why! I have been following Daves thread about MS not fueling his engine well enough. There are dyno results proving this, can they be posted with the reasons why MS fails to provide an engine with what it needs? I have been to SDS's site and cannot find any reason why it would fuel an engine better. Is it the simplicity of setup? Is it that SDS has 16x16 fuel tables? Is SDS's processor faster? I'm sure if MS was capable of doing the same as SDS, Jake would have figured it out. I would like to learn differences! AGAIN, no bashing, just learning. Keith |
DNHunt |
Mar 17 2008, 08:42 AM
Post
#42
|
914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn. Group: Members Posts: 4,099 Joined: 21-April 03 From: Gig Harbor, WA Member No.: 598 |
I guess I would challenge the dyno results at least with my engine. MS never made it on the dyno.
Here's my take. None of the these knocks against MS are insurmountable but, they are potential pitfalls that aren't a concern with SDS. I have some assembly issues. 1)MS is homemade and it depends on the skill of the assembler. 2)Solder flux is acidic and if not cleaned well the board will deteriorate. Installation is realatively difficult because of the wide variety of applications and the number of options. This may be the biggest challenge. It was my wiring harness that let me down at Jake's. Tuning is way out of control with MS. It can be daunting looking at all the menus. Some of the stuff is a crap shoot cause it's not explained well. Changes are made frequently as a lot of code is experimental. If a person gets beyond all that MS will work just fine with 1 exception. The intake air temperature correction is almost impossible to get right because the tables are generated with only 3 entries. For people using MS check your AFR values with changes in IAT: I bet it will vary. There is a bandaid solution in the program which is a tunable 5 point table. So, on top of tuning all the other stuff one gets to tune out problems. The solution might be to use a GM sensor (that is what SDS uses) instead of a Bosch but, I don't know how that table was generated. Granted, all this stuff can be overcome but, in my case I have a lot invested in my motor (and Jake and Charles may have more invested in it). After spending a morning troubleshooting no rpm signal to the MS board, I decided to go with something I could depend on so, I switched. SDS is far simpler, it's easy to tune and the tune is stable with increasing temps. Dave |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 01:04 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |