SDS VS MS, I would like to figure this one out?????? Options

[toon1]

DISCLAIMER: This is not a thread to argue bash or to say yours is better than mine.

I would like to learn what the difference is!

I am an MS user and happy with it, if SDS will fuel an engine better, I would like to find out why!

I have been following Daves thread about MS not fueling his engine well enough. There are dyno results proving this, can they be posted with the reasons why MS fails to provide an engine with what it needs?

I have been to SDS's site and cannot find any reason why it would fuel an engine better.

Is it the simplicity of setup?
Is it that SDS has 16x16 fuel tables?
Is SDS's processor faster?


I'm sure if MS was capable of doing the same as SDS, Jake would have figured it out.

I would like to learn differences!

AGAIN, no bashing, just learning.

Keith

[r_towle]

Are you, Mark and Jake, confident enough to break a motor in using SDS only?

I ask because otherwise I would need carbs for three different combos as I get to each one, and that does not make sense.

This is purely for bench level break in (cam break in etc)
Once the motor is in the car, I can tune it from that point forward.

Is there enough canned a/f maps out there to get a decent baseline that wont flood the pistons?

Rich

[G e o r g e]

Are you, Mark and Jake, confident enough to break a motor in using SDS only?

I ask because otherwise I would need carbs for three different combos as I get to each one, and that does not make sense.

This is purely for bench level break in (cam break in etc)
Once the motor is in the car, I can tune it from that point forward.

Is there enough canned a/f maps out there to get a decent baseline that wont flood the pistons?

Rich

rich

I broke in my fresh rebuild with SDS

I used the lean - rich knob to smooth out while keeping my rpms between 2-2.4K
for the 25 minutes or so went well in my opinion, and I'm working towards novice status (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)