SDS VS MS, I would like to figure this one out?????? Options

[toon1]

DISCLAIMER: This is not a thread to argue bash or to say yours is better than mine.

I would like to learn what the difference is!

I am an MS user and happy with it, if SDS will fuel an engine better, I would like to find out why!

I have been following Daves thread about MS not fueling his engine well enough. There are dyno results proving this, can they be posted with the reasons why MS fails to provide an engine with what it needs?

I have been to SDS's site and cannot find any reason why it would fuel an engine better.

Is it the simplicity of setup?
Is it that SDS has 16x16 fuel tables?
Is SDS's processor faster?


I'm sure if MS was capable of doing the same as SDS, Jake would have figured it out.

I would like to learn differences!

AGAIN, no bashing, just learning.

Keith

[Jake Raby]

I believe that most of the things that MS uses as "advantages" are actually disadvantages.

They give more parameters to set up and that gives more parameters to "screw up".

The advantage that no one can appreciate until they have to use it is SDS's tech support that is absolutely unparalleled. Sure with MS you have a few guys that really know it online, but seldom will you get a phone call with the guy that built the system and have him sit on the phone with you for as long as needed to work through ANY issue.

Simplicity and support for my customers are the two main reasons why I exclusively use SDS. I need to know that if a customer has an FI related issue that I can't assist with that they can get accurate, prompt and kind service from the guys who built the unit and SDS has never failed me. I have engines running SDS on 6 Continents for a very good reason. ALL of my personal cars run SDS for that same reason.

I'll soon be firing up a 750 HP TIV engine and it'll be managed by SDS, and I'll leave the Autronic system I have on the shelf.

As a seasoned tuner that can smell a rich/ lean engine 50 yards away I don't trust MS for anything more than a science project. Soome people have had success with it and an equal number have had failures (most of which they don't post about publicly, but email me about when they pick up the pieces) when using the system on an aircooled engine.

Our engines are particular compared to a Chevy or rice burning water pumper.

Yes, I do have a biased opinion as I feel that experimentation isn't for the consumer.