SDS VS MS, I would like to figure this one out?????? Options

[toon1]

DISCLAIMER: This is not a thread to argue bash or to say yours is better than mine.

I would like to learn what the difference is!

I am an MS user and happy with it, if SDS will fuel an engine better, I would like to find out why!

I have been following Daves thread about MS not fueling his engine well enough. There are dyno results proving this, can they be posted with the reasons why MS fails to provide an engine with what it needs?

I have been to SDS's site and cannot find any reason why it would fuel an engine better.

Is it the simplicity of setup?
Is it that SDS has 16x16 fuel tables?
Is SDS's processor faster?


I'm sure if MS was capable of doing the same as SDS, Jake would have figured it out.

I would like to learn differences!

AGAIN, no bashing, just learning.

Keith

[Mark Henry]

Yep we could argue this till blue in the face, nothing new, audotronic, motec, etc. owners would tell us all that both systems are junk.

For me what is being replaced...a carb and a dizzy. Two very simple systems...then why do you need something over the top complicated?
As an AC VW engine builder (soon to retire, different story) I want something that does the job very well and is simple.
For the most part I don't trust a customer to zip up his own fly without getting his beans caught and I'm going to trust him with a complex system??? Take the blame if (and loss of money, time, etc) if he fuchs up .....not.

I was one of the first persons (if not the first) on this board to go SDS, don't care if your system has more bells.
I'm not looking back.
I'm also done.