SDS VS MS, I would like to figure this one out?????? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
SDS VS MS, I would like to figure this one out?????? |
toon1 |
Mar 16 2008, 01:11 PM
Post
#1
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,849 Joined: 29-October 05 From: tracy,ca Member No.: 5,022 |
DISCLAIMER: This is not a thread to argue bash or to say yours is better than mine.
I would like to learn what the difference is! I am an MS user and happy with it, if SDS will fuel an engine better, I would like to find out why! I have been following Daves thread about MS not fueling his engine well enough. There are dyno results proving this, can they be posted with the reasons why MS fails to provide an engine with what it needs? I have been to SDS's site and cannot find any reason why it would fuel an engine better. Is it the simplicity of setup? Is it that SDS has 16x16 fuel tables? Is SDS's processor faster? I'm sure if MS was capable of doing the same as SDS, Jake would have figured it out. I would like to learn differences! AGAIN, no bashing, just learning. Keith |
toon1 |
Mar 22 2008, 09:52 AM
Post
#2
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,849 Joined: 29-October 05 From: tracy,ca Member No.: 5,022 |
The real intention of this post was to usderstand why SDS can fuel an engine better than MS. there doesn't seem to be a clear cut answer, other than it's easier to setup. It seems as though they are comparable in their capabilities with SDS being a bit better in the IAT area.
Why is MS considered " experimental".? Since I have MS I will say , there are some probs. I encounered, not huge but frustrating. There have been very little probs. with the build portion (built it myself) but more with getting answers when there is a prob. . You do have to rely on the web site and wait for a response. When you are in the middle of a project and not getting a response, it suck's. I am restless and when there is a prob. I want an answer NOW! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) But there has never been a time when I posted and did not get a response. MS does have some good features like a soft rev limiter with a timer that when timed out will goes to a hard limiter. Great for AXing. MAF and MAP blend is avail. through MS. and could be of use on a t4, i've head of someone doing this. I can see Why Jake would lean twards SDS because of the ease of setup. He is not is the posistion of messing around with settings he does not need. Being able to setup an engine in 20min. is slick. I have chatted with people on the MS site that i'm sure can do the same with MS. Most of us on the otherhand, are hobbiest and building, installing, tuning and playing with different settings is fun and part of the hobbie. from what I've read in all the posts, it all comes down to choice. We've started a carb. vs. F.I. style of debate with F.I. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 12:04 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |