Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Camshaft recommendation for PMO'd 2.4S ?
amallagh
post Jul 16 2008, 05:13 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 103
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Cheshire, England
Member No.: 6,767



I've recently converted my 914-6 to a 2.4S spec engine with PMO 40 carbs.

The engine/heads are standard S spec but with 2.2S pistons giving about 9.3:1 compression rather and the std 8.5:1.

Can any one recommend a specific cam profile/supplier that is optimised for use on carbs with an S spec engine ?
If the std S cams from an MFI engine are considered to the the best for this application then I would be happy to hear your experiences.
I'm looking for a fast road cam to give me similar performance to the std S cams on MFI. The car is used on the road as well as for competition, so I need something smoothy and tractible at low RPM.

Regards
Andrew
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
amallagh
post Jul 17 2008, 07:02 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 103
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Cheshire, England
Member No.: 6,767



Great info, thankyou.

So is the Solex cam specifically optimised for use with Webers (PMOs) as well ?
I see the cam data posted above shows the progressively increased duration and lift from the T to the E to the S cam as you would expect.
The Solex grind however breaks this linear trend of these 3 cams with intake duration and lift sitting nicely between the E and S cam specs, but the exhaust duration is similar to the S and the lift is even greater. I see the lobe centres are also closer than on the S indicating more overlap. So the Solex is 'hotter' in some respects and 'milder' in others compared to the S cam.

Are these the characteristics that a Weber fuel system needs for peak performance ?
If the S cams make about 195bhp, and the E cams about 165bhp on a 2.4, then how much bhp would you expect with the Solex cams on Webers or PMOs ?

If the Solex cam is ideal for a PMO set up with S heads then the next question if where to I get a pair at a reasonable price ?

This has been really useful.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ArtechnikA
post Jul 17 2008, 07:39 PM
Post #3


rich herzog
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,390
Joined: 4-April 03
From: Salted Roads, PA
Member No.: 513
Region Association: None



QUOTE(amallagh @ Jul 17 2008, 09:02 PM) *

So is the Solex cam specifically optimised for use with Webers (PMOs) as well ?

it's reasonable to assume that the only 'optimised' combinations are what came from the factory. You should expect to do some tuning with whatever cams you get, which can be great fun, especially if you have a chassis dyno... "Let's see - the engins is running a bit rich above 5500 rpm - do I fit a smaller main or a bigger air correction?" The only real answer is you try both and see which the engine likes better. Jets are available. Emulsion tubes, which (help) modulate the transition between the idle circult and the mains less so.

QUOTE

I see the cam data posted above shows the progressively increased duration and lift from the T to the E to the S cam as you would expect.
The Solex grind however breaks this linear trend of these 3 cams with intake duration and lift sitting nicely between the E and S cam specs, but the exhaust duration is similar to the S and the lift is even greater. I see the lobe centres are also closer than on the S indicating more overlap. So the Solex is 'hotter' in some respects and 'milder' in others compared to the S cam.

You also have to factor in stuff like what pistons were available at the times and what valves the respective engines used to determine how much lift could be used without 'contact.'

QUOTE
Are these the characteristics that a Weber fuel system needs for peak performance ?

All those cams were good at what they were good at and less good at others. E was a good compromise. S has good peak power, crappy fuel economy, iffy driveability, and will foul plugs in light driving if jetted for peak power. it's all tradeoffs. You can also tweak things A LITTLE by advancing and retarding the cams a bit, a game even the factory played from time to time, but these engines do not respond to that trick like some do. Still, if you make a guess and decide you only missed what you wanted by a little, it's a cheap and easy thing to try.

QUOTE

If the S cams make about 195bhp, and the E cams about 165bhp on a 2.4, then how much bhp would you expect with the Solex cams on Webers or PMOs ?

at what rpm? with what venturiis? and what exhaust? You can speculate endlessly, and the fact is that all this stuff is more than a little nonlinear and the only real answer is to build up the engine and ask it, on a dyno. This more than anything is where the 'real' engine builders earn their big bucks.

QUOTE

If the Solex cam is ideal for a PMO set up with S heads then the next question if where to I get a pair at a reasonable price ?

you can't and you wouldn't want them if you could find them. Real Solex cams date from the days when Porsche was oiling cams by sending pressurised oil through a drilling in the center of the cam and letting it out through port in the base circle of the lobes as well as the bearing journals.

What you do is get a cam grinder (like WebCam) to grind that profile on either new billet or rewelded core cams. WebCam has been doing that game since the 50's and it's a trusted, reliable method. There are other grinders too, I've just researched WebCam a bit more than I have the others.

QUOTE

This has been really useful.
It's all a part of doing the homework.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
amallagh   Camshaft recommendation for PMO'd 2.4S ?   Jul 16 2008, 05:13 PM
brant   Andrew, have you driven an S cam MFI vehicle? if...   Jul 16 2008, 05:28 PM
ArtechnikA   ...so if you need something more tractable, then ...   Jul 17 2008, 06:52 AM
J P Stein   Solex or E cams are the cat's ass for a street...   Jul 16 2008, 06:01 PM
396   Solex or E cams are the cat's ass for a stree...   Jul 16 2008, 07:29 PM
scotty b   +1 for Solex :driving: S is great once you hit 6...   Jul 16 2008, 08:14 PM
Phoenix-MN   :agree: B)-->
QUOTE(scotty b ...   Jul 16 2008, 08:19 PM
Root_Werks   :agree: B)--><div class='quotetop...   Jul 24 2008, 11:21 AM
amallagh   Excuse my ignorance but what exactly in a Solex gr...   Jul 17 2008, 03:01 PM
Phoenix-MN   I think "Solex" was coined from the very...   Jul 17 2008, 04:16 PM
ArtechnikA   I think "Solex" was coined from the ver...   Jul 17 2008, 06:27 PM
amallagh   Great info, thankyou. So is the Solex cam specifi...   Jul 17 2008, 07:02 PM
ArtechnikA   So is the Solex cam specifically optimised for us...   Jul 17 2008, 07:39 PM
J P Stein   The big "problem" with S cams is duratio...   Jul 17 2008, 07:31 PM
ArtechnikA   MFI delivers fuel below the butterflies and has t...   Jul 17 2008, 07:46 PM
J P Stein   Tho I can't prove it, I suspect the MFI, S com...   Jul 17 2008, 08:38 PM
scotty b   Tho I can't prove it, I suspect the MFI, S co...   Jul 17 2008, 08:43 PM
ArtechnikA   Tho I can't prove it, I suspect the MFI, S co...   Jul 17 2008, 09:51 PM
brant   You've opened a big mystery box now there are ...   Jul 17 2008, 08:42 PM
ArtechnikA   by the way, you can get GE grinds for 3 bearing s...   Jul 17 2008, 10:01 PM
brant   did we ever establish if those are available for ...   Jul 17 2008, 10:09 PM
ArtechnikA   I know they exist I wish I knew you were looking ...   Jul 17 2008, 11:47 PM
amallagh   So if I glean some of the different opinions expre...   Jul 18 2008, 03:23 AM
ArtechnikA   If the Solex cam is ideal for a PMO set up with S...   Jul 18 2008, 05:32 AM
J P Stein   Like most of these old parts (or old style), findi...   Jul 18 2008, 07:29 AM
ArtechnikA   I forget exactly where I got these....no matter, ...   Jul 18 2008, 10:13 AM
J P Stein   The "ideal" cams for carbs would be the ...   Jul 18 2008, 07:49 AM
J P Stein   40s...sorry about the lousy pic. :D   Jul 18 2008, 05:01 PM
ArtechnikA   40s...sorry about the lousy pic. Actually it...   Jul 18 2008, 05:14 PM
TimT   Amallagh, I have a set of WebCam 158R grind cams,...   Jul 18 2008, 07:29 PM
amallagh   Amallagh, I have a set of WebCam 158R grind cams...   Jul 23 2008, 04:30 PM
6freak   Amallagh, I have a set of WebCam 158R grind cam...   Jul 24 2008, 10:42 AM
TimT   I forgot to add, I have dyno plots somwhere of t...   Jul 18 2008, 07:38 PM
J P Stein   Hay, Tim, that is a good buy.   Jul 18 2008, 09:20 PM
6freak   Hay, Tim, that is a good buy. Sent the man a P...   Jul 23 2008, 09:47 AM
sixnotfour   the cam card is listed on the website, looked at i...   Jul 24 2008, 10:48 AM
amallagh   the cam card is listed on the website, looked at ...   Jul 24 2008, 01:29 PM
J P Stein   Solex & S cams have the same 97 deg lobe cent...   Jul 24 2008, 07:06 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd April 2026 - 03:36 PM
...