case and head vents, do I need to run a breather box? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
case and head vents, do I need to run a breather box? |
wayne1234 |
Jan 22 2010, 11:23 PM
Post
#1
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 260 Joined: 6-April 09 From: indianapolis in Member No.: 10,238 Region Association: None |
Ok dual webber carbed 2.0, I think the PO had the head vents running to a T then to the oil breather near the oil cap... Is this right?? I did a search and now I'm really confused,,,,
|
Gint |
Jan 26 2010, 12:41 PM
Post
#2
|
Mike Ginter Group: Admin Posts: 16,083 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Denver CO. Member No.: 20 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
While I understand your point John and I agree with you, your facts with regard to polluted cities are in dispute. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif)
http://www.citymayors.com/environment/polluted_uscities.html http://green.yahoo.com/blog/daily_green_ne...ir-quality.html |
Cap'n Krusty |
Jan 27 2010, 01:58 PM
Post
#3
|
Cap'n Krusty Group: Members Posts: 10,794 Joined: 24-June 04 From: Santa Maria, CA Member No.: 2,246 Region Association: Central California |
While I understand your point John and I agree with you, your facts with regard to polluted cities are in dispute. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif) http://www.citymayors.com/environment/polluted_uscities.html http://green.yahoo.com/blog/daily_green_ne...ir-quality.html On some summer days in 1961, the air quality in Phoenix was poorer than Los Angeles. You have to remember that the photochemical components of smog aren't always present in the same quantities, but the other harmful components may still be there. I was in Denver in the summer of 1978 or 1979 for a swap meet at Storz Garage, and the smog was TERRIBLE! As for the SF Bay area, have you been there recently? Nasty. I stand by my statements. The Cap'n |
pbanders |
Jan 27 2010, 03:29 PM
Post
#4
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 939 Joined: 11-June 03 From: Phoenix, AZ Member No.: 805 |
While I understand your point John and I agree with you, your facts with regard to polluted cities are in dispute. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif) http://www.citymayors.com/environment/polluted_uscities.html http://green.yahoo.com/blog/daily_green_ne...ir-quality.html On some summer days in 1961, the air quality in Phoenix was poorer than Los Angeles. You have to remember that the photochemical components of smog aren't always present in the same quantities, but the other harmful components may still be there. I was in Denver in the summer of 1978 or 1979 for a swap meet at Storz Garage, and the smog was TERRIBLE! As for the SF Bay area, have you been there recently? Nasty. I stand by my statements. The Cap'n The emissions issue is one of the main reasons I've stuck with D-Jetronic on my car and have worked to keep all of the emissions controls on it functioning properly. The '75-76 systems were even better for emissions, but were a stopgap measure on the way to the use of true three-way cat with O2 sensor mixture control, which came after the 914's demise. Early D-Jet is still pretty good for emissions when properly tuned. Overrun fuel management, idle timing retard, fuel tank evaporative control and management, PCV system, and part-load mixture management all reduced emissions over the previous generation of cars. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 02:51 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |