Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Camber set up for six, Need some help
sixaddict
post Jan 23 2011, 10:18 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 804
Joined: 22-January 09
From: Panama City Beach, FL
Member No.: 9,961
Region Association: South East States



Doing some "work" to get more negative camber up front ...but now trying to decide entirre set up....Been so long since had this done I am forgetting.
RA1, 16 X 225 50 w/ 7.5" wheels front
Ditto 16 x 225 45 w/ 8.5 rear
Shooting for 2 1/2 negative up front
What should I do @ the rear.
Mainly DE/track but some autocrossing.
Prefer to compromise ax set-up as opposed to track. 2.7 at this time if it matters.
Thank for the help
Terry
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
brilliantrot
post Jan 23 2011, 02:42 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 125
Joined: 27-April 07
From: Costa Mesa Ca.
Member No.: 7,699



Negative camber settings are a function of driver aggression, tire construction, and the rest of the suspension set up. When I was running my relatively softly sprung 914-4 on Hoosiers, I had -4 degrees of front camber and tire temps said I needed more. Keeping the car flatter would have reduced the need for more camber.

For the rear, I pulled all the shims out and ran it. At the ride height I was at, that was 2.5 degrees in the rear and tire temps indicated that was about right.

My car was stock front T-bars, 22mm front sway bar set most of the way stiff, 200lb/in rear springs and 225/45/15s all the way around.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Jan 23 2011, 06:14 PM
Post #3


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



QUOTE(brilliantrot @ Jan 23 2011, 12:42 PM) *

Negative camber settings are a function of driver aggression........


I detect some B Roberts BS here.

Testing by GRM some years back showed that camber in excess of -3.5 degrees resulted in loss of braking performance to the detriment of AX times.... In other words, the test drivers started going slower. Those drivers were no slouches.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brilliantrot
post Jan 23 2011, 08:14 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 125
Joined: 27-April 07
From: Costa Mesa Ca.
Member No.: 7,699



QUOTE(J P Stein @ Jan 23 2011, 04:14 PM) *

QUOTE(brilliantrot @ Jan 23 2011, 12:42 PM) *

Negative camber settings are a function of driver aggression........


I detect some B Roberts BS here.

Testing by GRM some years back showed that camber in excess of -3.5 degrees resulted in loss of braking performance to the detriment of AX times.... In other words, the test drivers started going slower. Those drivers were no slouches.


I would say depends upon the car, track, and the tires. The article that I remember from GRM about camber testing was in a Mini Cooper S around Streets of Willow which isn't really a fair comparison to a 914 at AX. Braking does suffer at much over -2.5 in my experience but because I ran 4 front calipers and an ajustable pressure limiting valve I could still set it up to lock the rears at the same time as the front or a little before and trail brake heavily to help scrub a little more speed. Anyone who has driven a GoKart knows you can get by with out front brakes if you don't mind sliding a bit and understand the limitations.

Also to support my point, the 2009 GT3 Cup Service Manuel I have suggests starting at -4 degrees of camber in the front and they are neither softly sprung or have a worse camber curve than a 914. A 2009 Cup isn't a great comparison but probably is about as good a data point as a Mini Cooper is.

There are few absolutes in racing as every car and driving style are all a little different so none of us can really say anything more than what we have found on our cars. On my current 911 I have -2.8 in the front and that seems to be enough as I don't lean on the front tires with it quite as much as I do in a mid engined car.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th May 2024 - 03:59 AM