 Is 1679cc 1.7 914 elgble for FSP in SCCA? |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| grantsfo |
 May 25 2011, 01:16 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Arrrrhhhh!  Group: Members Posts: 4,327 Joined: 16-March 03 Member No.: 433 Region Association: None  |
Is 1.7 1679cc 914 elgible for FSP? I was thinking a cheap fun car would be a FSP 914 if it is in fact in that class. I was looking at June Fast Track and see they say cars not classified between 1.7 and 3.0. So assume cars up to 1.7 go to FSP? Isnt a 914 technically below 1.7 with 1679cc motor? So would it default to FSP?
I was thinking the car with headers and street prepared setup might just be a sleeper FSP car if its legal. It be a fun car too as you could keep it street legal. And with 1.7s being cheaper I just wonder? Clearly if would be a HP underdog but I dont know of many cars in that class right now that have potential of dipping down around 1800 to 1900 lbs. I was thinking of buying 1.7 start in FSP then go to GP in later stages. |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| hydroliftin |
May 25 2011, 01:38 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 373 Joined: 8-November 06 From: Vallejo, CA Member No.: 7,180 Region Association: Northern California |
QUOTE(grantsfo @ May 25 2011, 12:16 PM)  Is 1.7 1679cc 914 elgible for FSP? I was thinking a cheap fun car would be a FSP 914 if it is in fact in that class. I was looking at June Fast Track and see they say cars not classified between 1.7 and 3.0. So assume cars up to 1.7 go to FSP? Isnt a 914 technically below 1.7 with 1679cc motor? So would it default to FSP? I was thinking the car with headers and street prepared setup might just be a sleeper FSP car if its legal. It be a fun car too as you could keep it street legal. And with 1.7s being cheaper I just wonder? Clearly if would be a HP underdog but I dont know of many cars in that class right now that have potential of dipping down around 1800 to 1900 lbs. I was thinking of buying 1.7 start in FSP then go to GP in later stages. According to this it appears to be D.. http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2011/stprepc.html |
|
|
|
| grantsfo |
May 25 2011, 02:15 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Arrrrhhhh! Group: Members Posts: 4,327 Joined: 16-March 03 Member No.: 433 Region Association: None |
QUOTE(hydroliftin @ May 25 2011, 12:38 PM) QUOTE(grantsfo @ May 25 2011, 12:16 PM) Is 1.7 1679cc 914 elgible for FSP? I was thinking a cheap fun car would be a FSP 914 if it is in fact in that class. I was looking at June Fast Track and see they say cars not classified between 1.7 and 3.0. So assume cars up to 1.7 go to FSP? Isnt a 914 technically below 1.7 with 1679cc motor? So would it default to FSP? I was thinking the car with headers and street prepared setup might just be a sleeper FSP car if its legal. It be a fun car too as you could keep it street legal. And with 1.7s being cheaper I just wonder? Clearly if would be a HP underdog but I dont know of many cars in that class right now that have potential of dipping down around 1800 to 1900 lbs. I was thinking of buying 1.7 start in FSP then go to GP in later stages. According to this it appears to be D.. http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2011/stprepc.html Oh Dang it is. I'm going to write SEB and see if the 1.7 can be moved to FSP. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
grantsfo Is 1679cc 1.7 914 elgble for FSP in SCCA? May 25 2011, 01:16 PM
bam914 The 1.7, 1.8 and 2.0 are all on the same line in D... May 25 2011, 02:23 PM
grantsfo
The 1.7, 1.8 and 2.0 are all on the same line in ... May 25 2011, 03:06 PM bam914 I looked over it quickly. The problem with FSP wi... May 25 2011, 05:21 PM grantsfo
I looked over it quickly. The problem with FSP w... May 26 2011, 10:32 AM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 01:42 PM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.