 California S.B. 1744 (?), Exempting pre 1981 cars from smog inspections. |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| DblDog |
 May 22 2012, 09:24 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Member  Group: Members Posts: 164 Joined: 8-February 05 From: San Rafael, CA Member No.: 3,578 Region Association: Northern California  |
This bill was extended for reconsideration in the latter part of April. Has anyone been following this or heard if its been voted on again? Would likely change the value of '76 cars here in CA...in a good way.
|
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| euro911 |
May 22 2012, 08:30 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Retired & living the dream. God help me if I wake up! Group: Members Posts: 8,851 Joined: 2-December 06 From: So.Cal. & No.AZ (USA) Member No.: 7,300 Region Association: Southern California 
|
[rant]
Good luck with getting Bar-bore-a Boxer-shorts, or Dianne Frankenstein to even read your messages. Their staffs filter through everything and round-file anything that doesn't go along with their 'progressive' agendas (IMG:style_emoticons/default/mad.gif) Over the years, I've penned sincere, concerned letters to both of them on quite a few issues, with nary a receipt notification from either one. Those same letters were read and responded to by 'the other white meat', no problem. I thought that 'elected officials' were supposed to represent all constituents, not just their lap dogs and campaign supporters. No, I really didn't expect either BB or DF to respond, let alone with any intelligent debate. [/end rant] |
|
|
|
| Elliot Cannon |
May 22 2012, 09:20 PM
Post
#3
|
|
914 Guru Group: Retired Members Posts: 8,487 Joined: 29-December 06 From: Paso Robles Ca. (Central coast) Member No.: 7,407 Region Association: None 
|
QUOTE(euro911 @ May 22 2012, 07:30 PM)  [rant] Good luck with getting Bar-bore-a Boxer-shorts, or Dianne Frankenstein to even read your messages. Their staffs filter through everything and round-file anything that doesn't go along with their 'progressive' agendas (IMG:style_emoticons/default/mad.gif) Over the years, I've penned sincere, concerned letters to both of them on quite a few issues, with nary a receipt notification from either one. Those same letters were read and responded to by 'the other white meat', no problem. I thought that 'elected officials' were supposed to represent all constituents, not just their lap dogs and campaign supporters. No, I really didn't expect either BB or DF to respond, let alone with any intelligent debate. [/end rant] How about studying up on how our government works. Boxer and Fienstein are US Senators. They don't vote on stuff on the state level. Find out who your state senators and reps. are and write them an email, snail mail, etc. I got a letter from my state rep. saying the bill was still being discussed in the transportation committee and not up for vote yet. That was some time ago and I haven't heard much about it since. I don't think it has a chance. Anyone who votes for it will be immediately pounced upon by his or her opponent as being AGAINST clean air. Our cowardly state reps. don't vote for or against to improve life in California, all they're interested in is getting re-elected. Whoa! This almost sounds like a political post. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/av-943.gif) |
|
|
|
| euro911 |
May 22 2012, 10:15 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Retired & living the dream. God help me if I wake up! Group: Members Posts: 8,851 Joined: 2-December 06 From: So.Cal. & No.AZ (USA) Member No.: 7,300 Region Association: Southern California
|
QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ May 22 2012, 08:20 PM) ... Boxer and Fienstein are US Senators. They don't vote on stuff on the state level. ... You're absolutely correct, but my one-way correspondence with those two wasn't concerning state senate bills. My rant was more about political polarization and what seems to be non-representation (and yes, I know it runs rampant in both parties) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/pray.gif) You are a Master Debater (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif) |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
DblDog California S.B. 1744 (?) May 22 2012, 09:24 AM
eric9144 If it sounds too good to be true...
Lets hope thi... May 22 2012, 10:50 AM
damesandhotrods
If it sounds too good to be true...
Lets hope th... May 22 2012, 07:11 PM 76-914
If it sounds too good to be true...
Lets hope t... May 22 2012, 07:35 PM euro911 I'm hoping ... I really want a Vanagon Westy, ... May 22 2012, 10:59 AM LotusJoe
This bill was extended for reconsideration in the... May 22 2012, 11:03 AM arkitect Do you have the SB number wrong? The search I did ... May 22 2012, 11:04 AM euro911 April 10 2012 - Set, second hearing. Failed passag... May 22 2012, 11:23 AM mrbubblehead there was a petition going around. i should have p... May 22 2012, 05:47 PM jmill It would be nice but I don't think big busines... May 22 2012, 07:35 PM Andyrew Do we know who said yes and who said no? May 22 2012, 07:38 PM DblDog Dave, I don't know if I'm doing this right... May 22 2012, 08:57 PM 76-914 I will say that B&F have both responded (via a... May 23 2012, 07:56 AM arkitect I'd be willing to chip in to the cause, ... May 23 2012, 08:34 AM Dave_Darling This has veered well into the territory of politic... May 23 2012, 10:36 AM Elliot Cannon
This has veered well into the territory of politi... May 23 2012, 07:14 PM euro911 The comments about the Senators aside, this is NOT... May 23 2012, 07:34 PM SLITS The original "killer" of the 30 year exe... May 23 2012, 10:50 AM mrbubblehead
The original "killer" of the 30 year ex... May 23 2012, 05:59 PM Elliot Cannon
The original "killer" of the 30 year ex... May 23 2012, 07:16 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th June 2024 - 01:46 PM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.