Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Flywheel question
jmargush
post Jul 22 2012, 05:00 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 463
Joined: 8-June 04
From: Goshen, IN
Member No.: 2,176



I have a flywheel off of the 2.0 that I am rebuilding and it has been machined down approx. 3.2mm from what I measure on other flywheels I have off of 1.8 engines.

The step down to the clutch surface was machined the same amount but I was curious if there are any concerns with using a flywheel that has been machined this much?

One issue I did experience when I was dismantling the engine is you can't get a socket around the bolts that hold the clutch on, so i was considerinf using a cap (allen) bolt.
Attached ImageAttached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
somd914
post Jul 23 2012, 04:02 AM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,171
Joined: 21-February 11
From: Southern Maryland
Member No.: 12,741
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I just fought the same battle. A resurfaced flywheel I had measured 8.5 mm on the step down from tooth ring to pressure plate surface, old was 7mm. New has recessed bolt heads when attaching the pressure plate, the old did not. When installed the fork travelled approx 1.5" or so before contact and the clutch would not disengage with the fork hitting the tranny case. The resurfaced flywheel is headed to the scrap pile...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mrbubblehead
post Jul 23 2012, 06:23 AM
Post #3


Twodollardoug
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,155
Joined: 17-December 10
From: calimesa ca.
Member No.: 12,492
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(somd914 @ Jul 23 2012, 03:02 AM) *

I just fought the same battle. A resurfaced flywheel I had measured 8.5 mm on the step down from tooth ring to pressure plate surface, old was 7mm. New has recessed bolt heads when attaching the pressure plate, the old did not. When installed the fork travelled approx 1.5" or so before contact and the clutch would not disengage with the fork hitting the tranny case. The resurfaced flywheel is headed to the scrap pile...

i'll take it.... if i pay for shipping????
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
somd914
post Jul 23 2012, 05:35 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,171
Joined: 21-February 11
From: Southern Maryland
Member No.: 12,741
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(mrbubblehead @ Jul 23 2012, 08:23 AM) *

QUOTE(somd914 @ Jul 23 2012, 03:02 AM) *

I just fought the same battle. A resurfaced flywheel I had measured 8.5 mm on the step down from tooth ring to pressure plate surface, old was 7mm. New has recessed bolt heads when attaching the pressure plate, the old did not. When installed the fork travelled approx 1.5" or so before contact and the clutch would not disengage with the fork hitting the tranny case. The resurfaced flywheel is headed to the scrap pile...

i'll take it.... if i pay for shipping????


PM sent
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 08:45 AM