Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Instructions...diagrams or pictures??
Which is prefered for installations?
Which is prefered for installations?
Diagrams [ 9 ] ** [56.25%]
Pictures [ 7 ] ** [43.75%]
Total Votes: 16
Guests cannot vote 
Mueller
post Apr 22 2003, 03:18 PM
Post #1


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



Do you most of you actually read the instructions or do you wait till you hit a wall?

Are instructions with too many details and notes bad?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
need4speed
post Apr 22 2003, 07:25 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 339
Joined: 11-April 03
From: Arroyo Grande, CA
Member No.: 564



yeah, well, where diagrams suck, it's usually because they were poorly drawn. If they're drawn by someone who has a poor spacial understanding of the part, or how it's used, or what it looks like - quite often they draw from a reference photo, and the photo is of poor quality, so due to overexposure or underexposure, or crud on the part, or poor choice of orientation, the drawing ends up not being much better.

And where the photos suck, it's often the same reasons mentioned above -
Or: a photograph simply can't give you a good 3-dimensional understanding of the part, because it's a complex shape, and can't be properly oriented so that all aspects of the shape are visible, and there's where one of two things can solve the problem:
multiple angles, or doing a cutaway.
If the artist is good, the cutaway can be done in a diagram without sacrificing the part.

All of these things really boil down to how much is spent on production of (I assume we're talking about) manuals. Whether they hired a good artist - whether they commissioned him or her to do a thorough job, whether they had a good photographer to take reference good reference pics, or whether the artist had a physical model, or engineering drawings to work from.

I'm an art-school dropout, and frankly, not really that good of an artist - (professionally, I do computer support, I don't really even do art as a hobby anymore), but long ago, I did some work doing drawings for a manufacturer of automatic gate openers. The end result sucked. Partially because of my poor quality work (and I was cheap, so that's why I got the job instead of someone good). But also largely because the manufacturer was a cheapskate, and didn't want to pay for the hours it would have taken to really do that job properly.

So my preference?
Either or - as long as the diagrams or photographs convey the information necessary to get the job done, for both the novice (who may not have any familliarity with the parts) and the expert. (who will likely not even crack open the book in the first place).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th June 2024 - 02:52 AM