 Are 911T and 914/6 front struts the same thing? |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| Mark Henry |
 Jan 8 2013, 10:30 AM
Post
#1
|
|
that's what I do!  Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada  |
I have a set of struts sold to me as 911T struts. But mrHyde pointed out to me that they are a 914/6 number.
So were Boge part # 914 341 091 struts used on 911T's? I have everything for this conversion, but I'm going to have to buy new balljoints |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| toolguy |
Jan 8 2013, 12:37 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,275 Joined: 2-April 11 From: San Diego / El Cajon Member No.: 12,889 Region Association: Southern California 
|
Yes, that is a good part number. 914-341-091-00 . it is for the left side on an 914-6. . and -092-00 is for the right side . and they were Boge. . . if it ended in a -34 then it was a Bilstein and was optional for 4 cylinder cars. . . but only the -00 was listed as available for sixs. .
AFAIK, it is the same "M" strut as the "T" strut but that carried a 911 part number. . they both used the small 3 inch 911T calipers. . For 1970, they both had the pinch bolt for the ball joint . . . Later struts had the wedge pin. . |
|
|
|
| Cap'n Krusty |
Jan 8 2013, 04:44 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Cap'n Krusty Group: Members Posts: 10,794 Joined: 24-June 04 From: Santa Maria, CA Member No.: 2,246 Region Association: Central California |
QUOTE(toolguy @ Jan 8 2013, 10:37 AM)  Yes, that is a good part number. 914-341-091-00 . it is for the left side on an 914-6. . and -092-00 is for the right side . and they were Boge. . . if it ended in a -34 then it was a Bilstein and was optional for 4 cylinder cars. . . but only the -00 was listed as available for sixs. . AFAIK, it is the same "M" strut as the "T" strut but that carried a 911 part number. . they both used the small 3 inch 911T calipers. . For 1970, they both had the pinch bolt for the ball joint . . . Later struts had the wedge pin. . Well, without the "00" it's not a good number ........................ As for the ball joint attachment method, I had, before I closed up shop, a largish pile of worn out early struts. In some cases, the ball joints were bad, as well, but mostly the strut bases were just enlarged to the point the ball joint was no longer tight in the receptacle. Bad news. BTW, for those folks who need a pair of early 911 struts for small brakes, I have a nice pair here that are "excess to my needs". The Cap'n |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Mark Henry Are 911T and 914/6 front struts the same thing? Jan 8 2013, 10:30 AM
Cap'n Krusty
I have a set of struts sold to me as 911T struts.... Jan 8 2013, 11:59 AM
Mark Henry
[quote name='Mark Henry' post='1798662' date='Jan... Jan 8 2013, 01:40 PM Eric_Shea No... Early balljoints aren't bad.
There ha... Jan 8 2013, 01:46 PM Mark Henry
No... Early balljoints aren't bad.
There h... Jan 8 2013, 09:42 PM sixnotfour wedge bolt style cheaper manufacture Jan 8 2013, 02:08 PM Mark Henry Thanks Eric,
Now I have another question Boge stru... Jan 8 2013, 02:31 PM MDG
Thanks Eric,
Now I have another question Boge str... Jan 8 2013, 05:09 PM sixnotfour Bils' should go in and tighten up fine. Jan 8 2013, 09:50 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 09:09 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2025 IPS, Inc.