Corner Balance, Idiot check of percentages... |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Corner Balance, Idiot check of percentages... |
yeahmag |
Feb 18 2014, 04:44 PM
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,423 Joined: 18-April 05 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 3,946 Region Association: Southern California |
I'm getting very close to aligning and corner weighting the car. What sort of percentages should i be looking for in cross and front to rear? I would guess 50% cross with me in it and closer to 45% front/55% rear.
|
stimpyvan |
Feb 27 2014, 09:45 PM
Post
#2
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 26-February 14 From: Seattle Member No.: 17,040 Region Association: None |
Just out of curiosity, why not 50/50? Is everybody dead set against adding ballast?
Van |
J P Stein |
Feb 28 2014, 07:29 AM
Post
#3
|
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
Just out of curiosity, why not 50/50? Is everybody dead set against adding ballast? Van After busting my chops REDUCING weight, it pained me to add ballast to make class minimum. Adding weight for any reason beyond class requirements is an anathema. Shifting weight to get ( let's say ) side to side balance is SOP. Personally, I like a rearward weight bias percentage in the mid to high 50s. spending a lot of time fooling around with corner weights becomes moot under most non-static activities...makes ya feel good, tho. Note tires contact. Care to guess the percentage of car weigh on that left rear? |
stimpyvan |
Feb 28 2014, 09:15 AM
Post
#4
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 26-February 14 From: Seattle Member No.: 17,040 Region Association: None |
Just out of curiosity, why not 50/50? Is everybody dead set against adding ballast? Van After busting my chops REDUCING weight, it pained me to add ballast to make class minimum. Adding weight for any reason beyond class requirements is an anathema. Shifting weight to get ( let's say ) side to side balance is SOP. Personally, I like a rearward weight bias percentage in the mid to high 50s. spending a lot of time fooling around with corner weights becomes moot under most non-static activities...makes ya feel good, tho. Note tires contact. Care to guess the percentage of car weigh on that left rear? We had to add about 80 Lbs of ballast to our RX7 to get to 25/25/25/25. I wasn't wild about adding the weight, but without it the car felt as though it was trying to kill you in every corner (the transition from understeer to oversteer was very abrupt) and 90 minutes of that was very fatiguing. We had already done everything we could to eliminate/transfer weight. I haven't driven a 914 in about 25 years and I can't remember what the handling was like. Is the preference for a slightly rear weight bias because of the open diff? What wheels are on the back of that car? Thanks! |
J P Stein |
Mar 1 2014, 03:38 AM
Post
#5
|
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
We had to add about 80 Lbs of ballast to our RX7 to get to 25/25/25/25. I wasn't wild about adding the weight, but without it the car felt as though it was trying to kill you in every corner (the transition from understeer to oversteer was very abrupt) and 90 minutes of that was very fatiguing. We had already done everything we could to eliminate/transfer weight. I haven't driven a 914 in about 25 years and I can't remember what the handling was like. Is the preference for a slightly rear weight bias because of the open diff? What wheels are on the back of that car? Thanks! Just my.02 based on what you've written. Suspension set up is the place to cure an unwanted transision. Consistent handling be it slight understeer or oversteer with no transitions is ideal.I've not heard of any design flaw in the RX7 that would cause this (such as is the case in the 911). Class rules may preclude taking the steps necessary,( limits on allowable suspension mods, tires, whatever.) however. I have heard of guys building in a transision using progessive springs tho. Anything to avoid adding weight. The only dishonest feature of the 914's handlingis the snap oversteer that comes when messing with the absolute limit.....there is no warning, it just goes and there is no catching it unless one is readyfor it, It takes a lot of butt time in the car to know when you're on that edge.....even then it will "gotcha" occasionally. The rear wheels were made by Monocoque....now defunct. 10 X 16 and 11 lbs each. 22,5 X 10 Hoosier R35 slicks. I was fooln' with rear tire pressures & got em' a bit low. They were OK at 20 psi...but not at 18. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Damn near ran the tire off the rim (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) .....didn't go there no mo. The rear bias helps with traction. TB diff in place. Helps the car rotate controlably in the tight suff at AX. |
stimpyvan |
Mar 1 2014, 07:42 AM
Post
#6
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 26-February 14 From: Seattle Member No.: 17,040 Region Association: None |
QUOTE Just my.02 based on what you've written. Suspension set up is the place to cure an unwanted transision. Consistent handling be it slight understeer or oversteer with no transitions is ideal.I've not heard of any design flaw in the RX7 that would cause this (such as is the case in the 911). Class rules may preclude taking the steps necessary,( limits on allowable suspension mods, tires, whatever.) however. I have heard of guys building in a transision using progessive springs tho. I don't know if you would call it a design flaw, but the suspension on a 1980 RX7 is nothing to get excited about. Mac struts in the front with no adjustment for caster or camber and a live axle with a Watts linkage in the back. And we are very limited in the amount of suspension modifications that can be made. We didn't weigh the car until after our first race and the corner numbers were: Total weight: 2100# (with driver) LF = 37% RF = 30% LR = 18% RR = 15% Thus, the demonic handling. There simply wasn't enough weight that could be removed or moved to get anywhere close to a better balance, thus the ballast. Not surprisingly, the handling was vastly improved with equal weight at all corners (& we simply added about 30% more HP to overcome the additional 5% weight). QUOTE The rear bias helps with traction. TB diff in place. Helps the car rotate controlably in the tight suff at AX. Sorry to go OT here and pardon my ignorance, but what is a "TB Differential"? I Googled it and ended up reading about tuberculosis. Is TB a manufacturer? Pretty sure that neither of the transaxles we have are factory LSD but the 914 is still in the trailer and we haven't looked. Thanks for all the great info. Van |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th June 2024 - 11:31 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |