2.0 Engine Rebuild Advice Options

[VWTortuga336]

I'm working on stripping down my 2.0L out of my '74. I've done a top end rebuild on my '71 Type 1 engine, but am new to Type IVs and bottom end rebuilds. So, I'm looking for some advice.

So far, from what I can tell the heads on my engine look like they are still in good, re-usable condition, but the engine is seized and the cylinders are badly rusted to the pistons. At this point, would I be better off just using the BFH method to destroy the 94mm cylinders that installed now and go with 96mm's, or is there any hope in saving these? (I'm thinking there isn't) Also, there was water in the case, so what does that typically mean for internal component replacements - cam, crank, bearings, etc? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)

Just in the planning phase now and trying to collect as much info as possible.

[mapguy]

I am also going through this right now. I decided that 2056 was the way to go, mainly due to the better quality of the components. You're going to be out for new jugs and pistons anyway, why not go with the good 96mm KB units from European Motor Works?

Even if everything else is stock, this will be a better engine. If the FI tuning is turning you off, keep in mind that bleysing can do the tuning for you at a very reasonable cost.

There is really no reason NOT to go 2056 in my opinion, given that you'll have to replace these parts anyway.

My $.02

[DavidSweden]

What components do you have to change when changing to bigger pistons?