![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
DavidSweden |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 481 Joined: 8-June 14 From: Sweden Member No.: 17,452 Region Association: Scandinavia ![]() |
Stock engine 2.0 76 with stock D jet
I have searched the site and there seems to be mixed reviews regarding the Webcam #73 grind. Is this cam god with the stock FI and will it just bolt in without the need to change the rocker geometry, or should I stick with the stock cam? |
![]() ![]() |
Dave_Darling |
![]()
Post
#2
|
914 Idiot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,196 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona Member No.: 121 Region Association: Northern California ![]() ![]() |
I know people who claim to have made the D-jet work well on a 914 engine with the Web #73 cam. I also know people who claim that it can't be done. (The Cap'n is one of the latter.) I'm not sure if the difference is in how they define "working well", or if there were differences between the setups that they were trying on, or what.
One thing I'm a bit more sure about, though: I don't think the "it worked fine" people included having to pass an emissions test as part of their definition. Because I have strong doubts that a Web 73-equipped car would pass any but the most lenient sniffer tests. So if your car will have its emissions tested, I would stick to the stock cam grind. --DD |
914_teener |
![]()
Post
#3
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,266 Joined: 31-August 08 From: So. Cal Member No.: 9,489 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
I know people who claim to have made the D-jet work well on a 914 engine with the Web #73 cam. I also know people who claim that it can't be done. (The Cap'n is one of the latter.) I'm not sure if the difference is in how they define "working well", or if there were differences between the setups that they were trying on, or what. One thing I'm a bit more sure about, though: I don't think the "it worked fine" people included having to pass an emissions test as part of their definition. Because I have strong doubts that a Web 73-equipped car would pass any but the most lenient sniffer tests. So if your car will have its emissions tested, I would stick to the stock cam grind. --DD Dave....that's why they call it a -73 cause before that you are smog exempt.......... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Not. I am in the camp of the OP. Depends who you talk to. |
DavidSweden |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 481 Joined: 8-June 14 From: Sweden Member No.: 17,452 Region Association: Scandinavia ![]() |
Teener, You mean that the #73 has worked for you? |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th July 2025 - 04:38 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |