|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| DavidSweden |
Aug 30 2016, 02:53 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 481 Joined: 8-June 14 From: Sweden Member No.: 17,452 Region Association: Scandinavia |
I have the chance to buy a 2,2T motor.
Is this a good motor for a 914 6 conversion? Its not cheap so I want to be sure that its not wasted money. There is also a 2,4 available and its a bit cheaper. Advice required (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i1300.photobucket.com-17452-1472590389.1.jpg) |
![]() ![]() |
| horizontally-opposed |
Aug 31 2016, 12:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,456 Joined: 12-May 04 From: San Francisco Member No.: 2,058 Region Association: None
|
Running a 2.2 and disagree about the torque. 2.0Ts make really nice torque, as do 2.2 and, especially, 2.4Ts. Of course a 3.0 or 3.2 makes more torque, but those can be built into horsepower-oriented engines, too.
My 2.2 has a E pistons with a little compression, a bit of head work, and Solex cams. It really sings through the rev range on the way up to 7200 rpm, but it makes more midrange torque than I expected. A lot more. Very tractable, but does lose steam up top—so it isn't as thrilling at the top as an S. We lost 20 hp with the factory airbox back on (dropping from 169 rwhp to 149), but gained 12 back when we pulled the snorkel and air cleaner off—so need to figure that out as I'd like to avoid rain hats. |
| porschetub |
Sep 1 2016, 10:09 PM
Post
#3
|
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,039 Joined: 25-July 15 From: New Zealand Member No.: 18,995 Region Association: None |
Running a 2.2 and disagree about the torque. 2.0Ts make really nice torque, as do 2.2 and, especially, 2.4Ts. Of course a 3.0 or 3.2 makes more torque, but those can be built into horsepower-oriented engines, too. My 2.2 has a E pistons with a little compression, a bit of head work, and Solex cams. It really sings through the rev range on the way up to 7200 rpm, but it makes more midrange torque than I expected. A lot more. Very tractable, but does lose steam up top—so it isn't as thrilling at the top as an S. We lost 20 hp with the factory airbox back on (dropping from 169 rwhp to 149), but gained 12 back when we pulled the snorkel and air cleaner off—so need to figure that out as I'd like to avoid rain hats. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) that's why Porsche did the T motor,a touring drivers car,short stroke motors seems to be popular builds these days,Henry @ Supertechs been doing a few. From a conversion point of view I would suggest the Op goes for the 2.4 easy fit to the 914 g/box and no cooler install. Op has gone into hiding ? hopefully is reading up and makes a wise call (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer.gif) |
DavidSweden 2,2T Aug 30 2016, 02:53 PM
Cairo94507 That is a loaded question. What is the condition ... Aug 30 2016, 03:07 PM
mepstein 3.2 is the turnkey, gold standard. But any 6 makes... Aug 30 2016, 03:15 PM
Dave_Darling Are you rebuilding either one? If so, then you ca... Aug 30 2016, 03:27 PM
rgalla9146 If they're the same money and the same conditi... Aug 30 2016, 03:31 PM
porschetub Not much info to go on here,what isn't cheap? ... Aug 30 2016, 04:02 PM
23e Heure
If they're the same money and the same condit... Aug 30 2016, 05:00 PM
rgalla9146
If they're the same money and the same condi... Aug 30 2016, 07:19 PM
matthepcat I had a 2.2S motor with carbs on my last car. Pret... Aug 30 2016, 05:21 PM
Dominic
I had a 2.2S motor with carbs on my last car. Pre... Aug 30 2016, 05:47 PM
PanelBilly Will you enjoy having to work harder (select the r... Aug 30 2016, 05:59 PM
flyer86d I've been mentally beating this to death for t... Aug 30 2016, 06:34 PM
porschetub
The problem with the 2.2 911T engine is that it... Aug 31 2016, 01:17 AM
396
I've been mentally beating this to death for ... Aug 31 2016, 08:40 AM
flyer86d Also, back in the day, the 1980s, we all thought t... Aug 30 2016, 06:44 PM
SixerJ I wholeheartedly agree with the others, base condi... Aug 31 2016, 02:17 AM
23e Heure We ain't in Europe. Picky,picky. '73.5 is... Aug 31 2016, 05:12 AM
Wdunster I have a 2.4 in my car. I rebuilt it two years ago... Aug 31 2016, 07:10 AM
JmuRiz Re 3.2: I think it's hard to find a good one t... Aug 31 2016, 07:26 AM
morgan_harwell I also have a 2.4L-T in my 914. It has been a gre... Aug 31 2016, 09:35 AM
brant personal opinion...
nothing sounds as nice as a s... Aug 31 2016, 10:18 AM
Wdunster
personal opinion...
nothing sounds as nice as a ... Aug 31 2016, 10:39 AM
DavidSweden Thanks for all the input. I decided not to buy the... Sep 2 2016, 10:15 AM
mepstein
Thanks for all the input. I decided not to buy th... Sep 2 2016, 02:47 PM
flyer86d That's a great combination and very similar to... Sep 1 2016, 12:26 AM
Dave_Darling You need a 914-6 flywheel, AKA a 1969 911T flywhee... Sep 2 2016, 11:12 AM
DavidSweden I picked up the motor for my 6 conversion . Its a ... Sep 9 2016, 01:55 PM
mepstein Probably. Maybe try 140# Not very expensive. ... Sep 9 2016, 02:48 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th March 2026 - 11:33 PM |
| All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
|
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |