![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
DavidSweden |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 481 Joined: 8-June 14 From: Sweden Member No.: 17,452 Region Association: Scandinavia ![]() |
I have the chance to buy a 2,2T motor.
Is this a good motor for a 914 6 conversion? Its not cheap so I want to be sure that its not wasted money. There is also a 2,4 available and its a bit cheaper. Advice required (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i1300.photobucket.com-17452-1472590389.1.jpg) |
![]() ![]() |
horizontally-opposed |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,456 Joined: 12-May 04 From: San Francisco Member No.: 2,058 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
Running a 2.2 and disagree about the torque. 2.0Ts make really nice torque, as do 2.2 and, especially, 2.4Ts. Of course a 3.0 or 3.2 makes more torque, but those can be built into horsepower-oriented engines, too.
My 2.2 has a E pistons with a little compression, a bit of head work, and Solex cams. It really sings through the rev range on the way up to 7200 rpm, but it makes more midrange torque than I expected. A lot more. Very tractable, but does lose steam up top—so it isn't as thrilling at the top as an S. We lost 20 hp with the factory airbox back on (dropping from 169 rwhp to 149), but gained 12 back when we pulled the snorkel and air cleaner off—so need to figure that out as I'd like to avoid rain hats. |
porschetub |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,816 Joined: 25-July 15 From: New Zealand Member No.: 18,995 Region Association: None ![]() |
Running a 2.2 and disagree about the torque. 2.0Ts make really nice torque, as do 2.2 and, especially, 2.4Ts. Of course a 3.0 or 3.2 makes more torque, but those can be built into horsepower-oriented engines, too. My 2.2 has a E pistons with a little compression, a bit of head work, and Solex cams. It really sings through the rev range on the way up to 7200 rpm, but it makes more midrange torque than I expected. A lot more. Very tractable, but does lose steam up top—so it isn't as thrilling at the top as an S. We lost 20 hp with the factory airbox back on (dropping from 169 rwhp to 149), but gained 12 back when we pulled the snorkel and air cleaner off—so need to figure that out as I'd like to avoid rain hats. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) that's why Porsche did the T motor,a touring drivers car,short stroke motors seems to be popular builds these days,Henry @ Supertechs been doing a few. From a conversion point of view I would suggest the Op goes for the 2.4 easy fit to the 914 g/box and no cooler install. Op has gone into hiding ? hopefully is reading up and makes a wise call (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer.gif) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 08:56 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |