Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Factory 911, 914/6, 916 air boxes, How many different designs?
horizontally-opposed
post Sep 26 2016, 11:11 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,456
Joined: 12-May 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 2,058
Region Association: None



Went to the dyno to do a first dial-in on the carbs and made 169.9 hp at the rear wheels with no air filters. Was pretty jazzed, and then the dyno operator said "Now watch when we put the air box back on...it'll be even nicer."

We lost 20 hp.

It was the end of the day, and I still need to finalize exhaust before we really dial the thing in, but we pulled the snorkel and air filter to do one more run. We gained 12 hp back, so 162 hp at the wheels. This from a 2.2 six with E pistons, a bit of compression, Solex cams, a bit of head work, headers, a single-tip Leistritz muffler (now a two-tip Dansk sport muffler), and Webers.

My question: How many variations of the factory air box were there between 1965 and 1973? Carbs, MFI, T, E, S, etc? I know there were metal ones and plastic ones (my air box is plastic), but I'm wondering if anyone knows a link that explains the variations, or can provide Cliff Notes from which to start my research? I'd love to keep a factory air box on the car, as I like the noise reduction, but would like to get some of that power back. Engine also feels hesitant past 6000 rpm.

I know, I know—rain hats. I'd prefer not to go that way. Thoughts?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
raynekat
post Sep 26 2016, 05:32 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,169
Joined: 30-December 14
From: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Member No.: 18,263
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Doesn't sound right to me that you're losing power with the air box?
170hp out of a 2.2E sounds pretty good to me.
The 3.0 SCRS ran pretty much a stock airbox and made something like 255hp I believe.

All the different iterations of the early 911's ran pretty much the same airbox, some plastic, some metal, some carbs, some MFI, but basically the same basic configuration.
Hopefully there is something easy that you're missing that will get you back that power you're missing with the airbox.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
horizontally-opposed
post Sep 26 2016, 05:55 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,456
Joined: 12-May 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 2,058
Region Association: None



QUOTE(raynekat @ Sep 26 2016, 04:32 PM) *

Doesn't sound right to me that you're losing power with the air box?


Me neither!

QUOTE(raynekat @ Sep 26 2016, 04:32 PM) *

170hp out of a 2.2E sounds pretty good to me.


At the wheels, no less. I was hoping for 160-170 at the crankshaft. Who knows how accurate the dyno is, but it's a pretty good one...so it may be making an honest 190-200hp. It was a very pleasant surprise. Engine builder undersold it, other than the smile and a twinkle in his eye when I asked what it might make, and if he thought 160-170 was achievable. He likes building the small-bore engines.


QUOTE(raynekat @ Sep 26 2016, 04:32 PM) *

Hopefully there is something easy that you're missing that will get you back that power you're missing with the airbox.


Hopefully, but not seeing it just yet.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th July 2025 - 07:00 PM