Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Factory 911, 914/6, 916 air boxes, How many different designs?
horizontally-opposed
post Sep 26 2016, 11:11 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,456
Joined: 12-May 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 2,058
Region Association: None



Went to the dyno to do a first dial-in on the carbs and made 169.9 hp at the rear wheels with no air filters. Was pretty jazzed, and then the dyno operator said "Now watch when we put the air box back on...it'll be even nicer."

We lost 20 hp.

It was the end of the day, and I still need to finalize exhaust before we really dial the thing in, but we pulled the snorkel and air filter to do one more run. We gained 12 hp back, so 162 hp at the wheels. This from a 2.2 six with E pistons, a bit of compression, Solex cams, a bit of head work, headers, a single-tip Leistritz muffler (now a two-tip Dansk sport muffler), and Webers.

My question: How many variations of the factory air box were there between 1965 and 1973? Carbs, MFI, T, E, S, etc? I know there were metal ones and plastic ones (my air box is plastic), but I'm wondering if anyone knows a link that explains the variations, or can provide Cliff Notes from which to start my research? I'd love to keep a factory air box on the car, as I like the noise reduction, but would like to get some of that power back. Engine also feels hesitant past 6000 rpm.

I know, I know—rain hats. I'd prefer not to go that way. Thoughts?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
jd74914
post Sep 29 2016, 01:26 PM
Post #2


Its alive
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,852
Joined: 16-February 04
From: CT
Member No.: 1,659
Region Association: North East States



It's too bad you didn't get to try with snorkel and without air filter to see how it compared to the fully assembled box. My guess is that the snorkel is your limiting factor, not the filter and that something like Britain's bell mouth would make up the power difference. The snorkel is a pretty small diameter restriction one of the more important parts of the intake.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
horizontally-opposed
post Sep 29 2016, 03:30 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,456
Joined: 12-May 04
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 2,058
Region Association: None



QUOTE(jd74914 @ Sep 29 2016, 12:26 PM) *

It's too bad you didn't get to try with snorkel and without air filter to see how it compared to the fully assembled box. My guess is that the snorkel is your limiting factor, not the filter and that something like Britain's bell mouth would make up the power difference. The snorkel is a pretty small diameter restriction one of the more important parts of the intake.


Agreed, though the gaping hole when we removed the snorkel and the filter probably wasn't all that restrictive—and we were still losing 8 hp. (Continues head scratching)

There has to be an answer to this. Hoping someone can shed some light on whether there were different snorkels and/or main air boxes for 911T, E, S, RS, SC/RS, etc—particularly the plastic air boxes. They seem far more interested in antenna tips and hood strut stickers over on that other board. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th July 2025 - 06:47 PM