Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Oil bath conversion to paper filter EASY/CHEAP, Getting rid of icky 1970 oil bath
pgollender
post Nov 16 2016, 11:28 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 193
Joined: 5-July 11
From: Sacramento
Member No.: 13,281
Region Association: Northern California



When putting my new engine back into my 1970, I just couldn't stand the thought of putting that icky oil bath air filter back in, so I got out a Dremel tool and modified the stock air filter.
Attached Image
First I cut the top open and removed that icky mess of nylon fibers.
Attached Image
Then I used the dremel cutoff tool to trim the flange to about 5/16" That will serve to hold the new paper element centered in place.
Attached Image
K&N E-2630 filter fits perfectly. Inside diameter 7.125", outside diameter 9.0", Height - 2.0" The rubber surfaces are slightly sticky and make great contact top and bottom.
Attached Image
Next use the dremel and cut the bottom ring it off exactly at the vertical-horizontal junction and discard. MAKE SURE you meticulously clean the metal shavings out afterwards. The last thing you want is your engine to inhale those fine metal particulates and ruin your new/old engine.
Attached Image
Apply your new filter into the top lid.
Attached Image
Viola ! Finished product. No more icky oil bath.
Total project cost: $53
4 dremel mini cut-off discs = $8
K&N 50,000 mile washable reusable filter =$45
Project Time: About 40 minutes
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
luskesq
post Nov 17 2016, 09:31 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 24-October 10
From: Fresno, CA
Member No.: 12,303
Region Association: Central California



The Capt'n wouldn't have approved the K'N but good job. Filter looks like what I have on my '70 914_4

Keith
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pgollender
post Nov 17 2016, 11:33 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 193
Joined: 5-July 11
From: Sacramento
Member No.: 13,281
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(luskesq @ Nov 17 2016, 07:31 PM) *

The Capt'n wouldn't have approved the K'N but good job. Filter looks like what I have on my '70 914_4

Keith

Keith, you are quite right about the late Capt'n's opinion. I posted the same question a couple years ago, he vehemently defended the argument for the oil bath system.
In my simple mind, if you blow thru the intake port of the stock of original filter vs. my modified K&N filter, there is clearly much less air resistance from the latter. Relocating the actual intake to a colder pick-up location rather than directly over the hot tins, should in theory help with performance as well, even in FI systems. I think someone already posted elsewhere on world that he was achieving about 5 horses more with cold pick-up location. These are minimal changes in design that achieve " free horsepower".
The real reason for me was to dump that icky oil trash tray. (No offense to the purists out there)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 04:22 AM