|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| jesse7flying |
Sep 29 2017, 11:40 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 138 Joined: 9-August 16 From: Burleson,TX Member No.: 20,281 Region Association: None
|
I've tried doing some research so I wouldn't ask too many stupid questions, but here goes. I acquired a 1.8L engine that had dropped a valve. My plan is to upgrade the guts to make a 2056 out of it. I've bought a 2.0L crank and rods (thks Dominic) to put in the "new" engine as recommended by Jake Raby in some older posts. The thing Raby does not address (unless I missed it, very possible) is what do I do about a cam? It seems like Raby's default position is to use carbs, but I would like to go with the FI system. Does that mean that I need to source a FI system from a 2.0L motor including the MPS, AFR, ECU, injectors, etc, or is anything off a 1.7 or 1.8L motor usable in this case? Once I have a list of items to buy, I will place a WTB ad in the forum, but any suggestions to point me in the right direction would be very much appreciated.
Regards--Jesse BTW, I did not mention that I'm trying to do this upgrade as cheaply as I can, but I don't want to be stupid about it, lol. |
![]() ![]() |
| jesse7flying |
Sep 30 2017, 11:50 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 138 Joined: 9-August 16 From: Burleson,TX Member No.: 20,281 Region Association: None
|
Jim,
Just so I understand, you say you upgraded your '75 L-Jet to 96mm P/C and a 2L crank. Was it a 1.8L to begin with? The stock cam you mention, was that a stock 1.8L cam or a 2.0L cam? Was there a reason for using a Vanagon TB instead of the 2.0L TB? Just want to make sure I understand the baseline condition and not assume anything. Thanks for the help. Jesse |
| 914_teener |
Sep 30 2017, 11:57 AM
Post
#3
|
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,268 Joined: 31-August 08 From: So. Cal Member No.: 9,489 Region Association: Southern California |
Jim, Just so I understand, you say you upgraded your '75 L-Jet to 96mm P/C and a 2L crank. Was it a 1.8L to begin with? The stock cam you mention, was that a stock 1.8L cam or a 2.0L cam? Was there a reason for using a Vanagon TB instead of the 2.0L TB? Just want to make sure I understand the baseline condition and not assume anything. Thanks for the help. Jesse My understanding of the stock camshafts are that they are all the same lift and duration. I could be wrong be I am pretty sure that is the case. |
jesse7flying upgrading to 2056 Sep 29 2017, 11:40 AM
mgphoto Your L-Jet on the 1.8 is a very good candidate for... Sep 29 2017, 11:51 AM
914 7T3 I'm far from an expert on this, but will be do... Sep 29 2017, 12:50 PM
jim_hoyland I just upgraded my ‘75 L-Jet to 96mm P/C’s wit... Sep 29 2017, 01:00 PM
jeffdon
I just upgraded my ‘75 L-Jet to 96mm P/C’s wi... Sep 29 2017, 09:54 PM
jim_hoyland
I just upgraded my ‘75 L-Jet to 96mm P/C’s w... Sep 30 2017, 09:02 AM
dlee6204
Your L-Jet on the 1.8 is a very good candidate fo... Sep 29 2017, 01:01 PM
jim_hoyland
Your L-Jet on the 1.8 is a very good candidate f... Sep 29 2017, 04:08 PM
jesse7flying Should have mentioned that the 1.8 came with no FI... Sep 29 2017, 02:07 PM
914_teener Either system is fine.
They just work differently... Sep 29 2017, 06:29 PM
jim_hoyland [quote name='jesse7flying' date='Sep 3... Sep 30 2017, 05:18 PM
Mueller I put LJet on a stock 2.0 and never had problems. ... Sep 30 2017, 05:16 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th November 2025 - 02:52 AM |
| All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
|
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |