Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> CHT sensors GB PN 0280130012, $25 each need 10 takers
Mikey914
post Sep 23 2017, 10:10 AM
Post #1


The rubber man
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,679
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Hillsboro, OR
Member No.: 3,348
Region Association: None



I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.

The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul.

If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine.

-Mark
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
914Next
post Sep 23 2017, 11:46 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 699
Joined: 28-July 14
From: Ephraim Wisconsin
Member No.: 17,695
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Mikey914 @ Sep 23 2017, 12:10 PM) *

I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.

The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul.

If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine.

-Mark



Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mikey914
post Sep 25 2017, 02:06 AM
Post #3


The rubber man
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,679
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Hillsboro, OR
Member No.: 3,348
Region Association: None



QUOTE(914Next @ Sep 23 2017, 10:46 AM) *

QUOTE(Mikey914 @ Sep 23 2017, 12:10 PM) *

I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.

The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul.

If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine.

-Mark



Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks.

The only difference is that some have a ballast in line with it. If you have one and all your components are in the factory configuration, otherwise do not add one.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JamesM
post Oct 2 2017, 02:04 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,922
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Kearns, UT
Member No.: 5,834
Region Association: Intermountain Region



QUOTE(Mikey914 @ Sep 25 2017, 12:06 AM) *

QUOTE(914Next @ Sep 23 2017, 10:46 AM) *

QUOTE(Mikey914 @ Sep 23 2017, 12:10 PM) *

I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.

The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul.

If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine.

-Mark



Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks.

The only difference is that some have a ballast in line with it. If you have one and all your components are in the factory configuration, otherwise do not add one.


Double check that. If my memory serves me the "proper" sensor for a 73 2.0 setup had a resistance curve that was quite a bit different off by something like >1k ohms when cold. 73 was an odd duck setup as it used a unique CHT and MPS to get the 2.0 to run correctly on the 72 1.7 ECU. 74 the 2.0 got a unique ECU and went back to using sensors with curves closer to the 1.7s.

Ill see if I can dig up the data, if not I have both a 73 and 74 setup I can compare.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 01:47 AM