![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
horizontally-opposed |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,456 Joined: 12-May 04 From: San Francisco Member No.: 2,058 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
So I am hearing this is a very attractive setup for 4+ cylinder engines, and can be made to work with ITB setups for a flat six, such as PMO's. The 4BBL pricing sure is right, and it's said to be "self tuning" and a dream to work with/on.
Anyone have any experience of this, or know of a Porsche engine running it? |
![]() ![]() |
horizontally-opposed |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,456 Joined: 12-May 04 From: San Francisco Member No.: 2,058 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
When I think about EFI, I like the idea of the "who" behind the system.
Any company can go out, but I put more stock in Holley or something like Andrew pointed out (the MS3 unit). I think about some of the old Haltech or other random systems, and trying to keep a 368 or 486 laptop going to support them. Only way I'd do the Holley or MS3 is if I could use ITBs made for a flat six (i.e. PMOs). But the prices of these units are getting pretty interesting compared to Motec systems of not long ago—even the "budget" ganged four-cylinder Motec setups where you controlled a flat six like an inline three. Now we are seeing price points that make a conversion from a good, sellable set of 911 Webers pretty interesting. It isn't a bad time to be a car enthusiast... |
ConeDodger |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Apex killer! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 24,120 Joined: 31-December 04 From: Tahoe Area Member No.: 3,380 Region Association: Northern California ![]() ![]() |
When I think about EFI, I like the idea of the "who" behind the system. Any company can go out, but I put more stock in Holley or something like Andrew pointed out (the MS3 unit). I think about some of the old Haltech or other random systems, and trying to keep a 368 or 486 laptop going to support them. Only way I'd do the Holley or MS3 is if I could use ITBs made for a flat six (i.e. PMOs). But the prices of these units are getting pretty interesting compared to Motec systems of not long ago—even the "budget" ganged four-cylinder Motec setups where you controlled a flat six like an inline three. Now we are seeing price points that make a conversion from a good, sellable set of 911 Webers pretty interesting. It isn't a bad time to be a car enthusiast... Pete, I still recall our conversation a decade or so back at that drive-in in Napa Valley. You were right of course, the SDS system I used was only a bit better than a well tuned carb. Perhaps in its defense, it was controlling ITB’s that had massive vacuum fluctuations. Your argument, that the factory systems were so much more sophisticated was on my mind when I decided to go with the factory system on the 3.2 that ultimately found its way into my car. I do think the MS3 described by Andyrew is a much more advanced system and it’s hard to believe SDS is in the same price range. I plan on using this system with the new engine I’m putting in my 240Z. |
Mark Henry |
![]()
Post
#4
|
that's what I do! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada ![]() |
When I think about EFI, I like the idea of the "who" behind the system. Any company can go out, but I put more stock in Holley or something like Andrew pointed out (the MS3 unit). I think about some of the old Haltech or other random systems, and trying to keep a 368 or 486 laptop going to support them. Only way I'd do the Holley or MS3 is if I could use ITBs made for a flat six (i.e. PMOs). But the prices of these units are getting pretty interesting compared to Motec systems of not long ago—even the "budget" ganged four-cylinder Motec setups where you controlled a flat six like an inline three. Now we are seeing price points that make a conversion from a good, sellable set of 911 Webers pretty interesting. It isn't a bad time to be a car enthusiast... Pete, I still recall our conversation a decade or so back at that drive-in in Napa Valley. You were right of course, the SDS system I used was only a bit better than a well tuned carb. Perhaps in its defense, it was controlling ITB’s that had massive vacuum fluctuations. Your argument, that the factory systems were so much more sophisticated was on my mind when I decided to go with the factory system on the 3.2 that ultimately found its way into my car. I do think the MS3 described by Andyrew is a much more advanced system and it’s hard to believe SDS is in the same price range. I plan on using this system with the new engine I’m putting in my 240Z. Did you try the SDS in TPS only? Solved all my issues. You have to go into the hidden coding to change it. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st August 2025 - 04:44 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |