![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
Ansbacher |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 689 Joined: 4-July 14 From: Tampa Bay, Florida Member No.: 17,589 ![]() |
Car = '74 2.0 Liter, Dual Dellorto Carbs
For years I have been 'adequately" running an 009 mechanical only distributor. Finally took the pervasive advice out there to go with a vacuum advance dizzy from a 1.8L 914. Since only one of my Dellorto carbs had an existing vacuum port (ported type), I had to drill a port in my other one (no problem there). I used good quality anti-pulse valves in the lines and measured a maximum vacuum of 12 inches of mercury with partial throttle. Installed the 1.8 dizzy and set the timing, first without the vacuum lines attached. To satisfy my usual 30-32 degrees at 3500 RPM, the idle timing had to be at about 5-6 degrees (quite low for my setup which is happier at about 10 degrees. When I attached the vacuum lines my timing at 3500 RPM went sky high into the 40s. This seems way too high. Is this normal? Overall, I found the car to run better without the vacuum attached and the carbs plugged off. Am I doing something wrong here? I don't like the numbers I am getting. Everyone said this was the way to go with carbs, but I am not seeing results. Advice appreciated. Ansbacher |
![]() ![]() |
Rand |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Cross Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,411 Joined: 8-February 05 From: OR Member No.: 3,573 Region Association: None ![]() |
Did you just suggest that you can create so much horsepower in a slim sliver of a band (whichI will argue) that you are actually suggesting carbs are better? Ignoring altitudes (which is only one of the many huge side benefits of FI and why NO car comes carbs anymore)
The stock one. Still better than carbs? Which were implemented and when? Stone wheels also have the best traction. |
72hardtop |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 120 Joined: 11-September 13 From: Seattle/HB Ca./Fujieda-Japan Member No.: 16,378 Region Association: Pacific Northwest ![]() |
Did you just suggest that you can create so much horsepower in a slim sliver of a band (whichI will argue) that you are actually suggesting carbs are better? Ignoring altitudes (which is only one of the many huge side benefits of FI and why NO car comes carbs anymore) The stock one. Still better than carbs? Which were implemented and when? Stone wheels also have the best traction. The stock EFI systems have many parts that are NLA. Which is why if you go EFI go modern. As for a dual set up....if properly jetted you'll create more horsepower then an EFI set up. Ive tuned my Weber 40's in my 2056 T-4 hardtop bus and get better MPG's than the stock Type 4 powered buses with stock fuel injection. Cold start drive-ability is probably the best thing about an EFI set up. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th May 2025 - 12:25 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |