Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Basic Engine Questions, Firing Order and Water Out the Tailpipe
Highland
post Aug 14 2024, 05:07 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 542
Joined: 8-August 11
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 13,418
Region Association: Southern California



Wondering what the firing order isn't 1-4-2-3 instead of the actual 1-4-3-2. Wouldn't it make more sense to go back and forth between opposing sides? Would the engine sound smoother with 1-4-2-3?

I happen to be by my tailpipe when my engine transitioned from cold idle (~1800 rpm) to warm idle (~1000 rpm). When the rpm dropped water sputtered out the tail pipe and continued compared to dry exhaust while cold idle. I know water is a product of combustion, but does this tell me anything about running to rich or lean at these idle conditions?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Superhawk996
post Aug 15 2024, 11:46 AM
Post #2


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,031
Joined: 25-August 18
From: Woods of N. Idaho
Member No.: 22,428
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



QUOTE(Highland @ Aug 14 2024, 07:07 PM) *

Wouldn't it make more sense to go back and forth between opposing sides? Would the engine sound smoother with 1-4-2-3?





Disregard my answer I don’t think I’m understanding the question.


Look at a T4 crank and the answer will become obvious.


You would end up with two crank pins adjacent to each other and/or one large shared crank pin / rod journal. Having only two large crank pins that are 180 degrees opposite each other would create strength issues and problematic harmonics that would bend & fatigue the crank. This would place more stress on a crank that is only supported by three bearings.

This would also have an effect on cylinder back offset between 1/2 and 3/4 sides. I suspect the cylinders would end up too close together though I admit I’m not going to look into the dimensions to prove or disprove this.


As the firing order is currently, or as proposed, it is alternating across cylinder banks.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 10:46 PM