|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| Tom Perso |
Feb 1 2005, 07:41 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Crazy from the Cold... ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 647 Joined: 8-August 03 From: Kalamazoo, MI Member No.: 1,003 |
Hey Guys,
I am designing a MS system for my 2270 (163.86b cam, 48x38 valves, future Triad header). I am looking at running stock intake runners and possibly making a new plenum to run my Ford TB (probably from a 4.0L Exploder/Ranger). Are there any "design guidelines" that should be followed when making a new plenum, such as a certian volume required for engine displacement? Looking at space requirements, I see running the TB on top of the plenum is the only way to go. That, of course - begs the question... Is the stock 914 2.0L plenum a good starting point to modify to allow for the Ford TB? Here are some pics for reference... I had a Bus 2.0L intake system to borrow, so I am basing my measurements and ideas off of that. http://www.qtm.net/~persot/MS/ Any ideas, suggestions, etc, are appreciated! Thanks, Tom |
![]() ![]() |
| Tom Perso |
Feb 1 2005, 08:35 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Crazy from the Cold... ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 647 Joined: 8-August 03 From: Kalamazoo, MI Member No.: 1,003 |
Lots of good replies - thanks!
I have seen Shad's plenum in person - he built it out of fiberglass and it seemed to work pretty good. If I were to build one, I would use mild sheet steel and weld it together. I might pick Shad's brain and see what he says. Dave - thanks for the advice. I am thinking that the 2.0L plenum might be the way to go... I think adapting a domestic TB to it would be pretty easy. Jake, you have an interesting point about the lobe center. I've noticed that I never have a lot of vaccum at idle when I T'd the vac connections on the 44's. I never thought much about it though. Is the fact that there is little vac. at idle, so that is what makes it difficult to tune, or is it a vac. pulse (non-steady reading) at idle that makes it hard to tune? Thanks Tom |
Tom Perso FI Plenum Design Feb 1 2005, 07:41 AM
DNHunt Tom
I haven't really run my car enough to tel... Feb 1 2005, 08:05 AM
maf914 Tom,
Didn't Shad Laws build a plenum for a la... Feb 1 2005, 08:19 AM
Jake Raby With the cam that I set Dave up with, his plenum h... Feb 1 2005, 08:21 AM
DNHunt Tom
Don't give up on this. I believe there i... Feb 1 2005, 08:46 AM
Tom Perso I heard that running a new-unused fuel filter inli... Feb 1 2005, 08:52 AM
914efi SDS has an option for locking in a fuel value at a... Feb 1 2005, 09:20 AM
Jake Raby There may be ways to help the situation at idle, b... Feb 1 2005, 09:21 AM
Tom Perso ... Feb 1 2005, 09:30 AM
Jake Raby AThe idle is also inconsistent with an early openi... Feb 1 2005, 09:53 AM
Tom Perso Well, I've got the Mallory, so I can dink with... Feb 1 2005, 10:11 AM
Brett W Tom
I will have to agree with Jake on this one. T... Feb 1 2005, 12:00 PM
Reiche Feb 1 2005, 04:13 PM
DNHunt I think a more accurate statement is I got it to r... Feb 1 2005, 04:56 PM
Brett W ![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2025 - 04:32 AM |
| All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
|
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |