Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 2.7 with carbs, E or 964?
scotty b
post Apr 2 2005, 09:26 AM
Post #1


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



I am gathering parts for MY car (for a change) which I hope to start on next year. I will be building a 2.7 maybe (probably) with Je pistons. Weber carbs but not sure what cams to go with. E and 964 cams seem to be the most popular, but which is better? I would like real world opinions please. Is one better with stock pistons and one better for JE's (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif) Thanks for the help (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/mueba.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
ArtechnikA
post Apr 2 2005, 04:19 PM
Post #2


rich herzog
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,390
Joined: 4-April 03
From: Salted Roads, PA
Member No.: 513
Region Association: None



QUOTE (don9146 @ Apr 2 2005, 05:10 PM)
Everyone seems to have forgotten the Solex cams that came on the early year 911s. Their profile is between the "E" and "S" cams from later 911s....

I would think that an "S" cam would be a great match with that displacement engine.

we haven't forgotten the Solex cams, we just realise that they're hard to find new or serviceably used. if you're going with reman cams from WebCam (for instance) it's a nice profile - but like the S profile, it's got too much lift for a stock CIS (or 911T) piston. with aftermarket pistons it's a contender.

lots of people like the early S cams in bigger engines. it had a reputation of peing peaky with 2,0-liter displacement, which it was, but a 50% displacement increase adds in bottom-end the 2,0 engines never had.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th June 2024 - 08:16 PM