Fuel Injection vs Carbs, Which is better? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Fuel Injection vs Carbs, Which is better? |
jgara962 |
May 6 2005, 12:21 PM
Post
#1
|
Yo, this is how I roll Group: Members Posts: 823 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Napa, CA Member No.: 3,879 Region Association: Northern California |
I'm considering going to look at a '73 2.0L. The only thing holding me back is the FI has been converted to Webber 40's? What seems to work better/have more potential on 914's - the FI or Carbs? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif)
Any advice from those that have been there would be appriciated. |
lorrinl |
May 6 2005, 02:34 PM
Post
#2
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 24-April 05 From: Colorado Springs, CO Member No.: 3,976 |
Just to add one more piece of input: Here in Colorado, a car has to have the original emission equipment that the car was manufactured with, and be able to pass an emissions test (minimum unburned hydrocarbons/ not too rich, etc. from a chart for each car model). This alone keeps me from looking at cars with carbs. Even if the car is more than 30 years old, and has "collector plates", it must be tested every time it changes owners before new plates will be issued (I think I have those details right). Take care, Lorrin |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 06:41 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |