|
|

|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| ChrisFoley |
Dec 16 2005, 06:19 PM
Post
#1
|
|
I am Tangerine Racing ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,016 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Bolton, CT Member No.: 209 Region Association: None
|
Specifically I am looking for rotational stiffness (ie. twist) of the trailing arm due to the tire contact patch resisting sideways sliding of the car. I'm only interested in forces greater than 1G during cornering.
I already know what happens but go ahead and take a guess. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) I'll post pictures of my test fixture shortly. |
![]() ![]() |
| ChrisFoley |
Dec 16 2005, 09:23 PM
Post
#2
|
|
I am Tangerine Racing ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,016 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Bolton, CT Member No.: 209 Region Association: None
|
QUOTE Put the level on the trailing arm, not the lever I am confident that wouldn't change the test results Tim. I have a good sense of structural integrity (for lack of a better term). What happened was exactly what I predicted. Pretty much ALL of the movement occurred in the box section of the trailing arm. It was very easy to observe this during the test. The movement was not linear along the length of the box section either. Slightly less deflection was observed toward the front where it is wider. The fixture did not deflect. The structural tube/plate connection to the trailing arm did not deflect. The pivot shaft housing did not deflect. The tube and forging section of the trailing arm did not deflect. Very minor movement of the outer pickup bracket was observed. This bracket was a reinforced stock unit. I also have stock and my custom brackets I can test. The loads I imposed were well below the elastic limit of the materials of the trailing arm. It returned to the exact starting position after multiple repeated tests. I had no plans to test to the failure point but that is not a bad idea. Next would be to have two men lean on the bar. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif) |
Racer Chris How flexible do you think a stock, trailing arm is Dec 16 2005, 06:19 PM
TimT Chris the trailing arm appears to be a pretty sto... Dec 16 2005, 06:25 PM
J P Stein WAG:
1 deg @500 lbs.
I'm assuming you're ... Dec 16 2005, 06:26 PM
airsix What exactly do you mean by "1G". I'm sure you... Dec 16 2005, 07:09 PM
ppickerell Chris,
Do you intend to test before and after boxi... Dec 16 2005, 07:41 PM
Dave_Darling I'm guessing that most of the flex happens in ... Dec 16 2005, 07:54 PM
spare time toys My guess is it has flex designed into it at an amo... Dec 16 2005, 08:08 PM
Racer Chris So far JP is the only one really on the right trac... Dec 16 2005, 08:24 PM
Racer Chris Then I attached a 5ft piece of structural tubing t... Dec 16 2005, 08:26 PM
Racer Chris by putting a 200lb man's weight at the end of ... Dec 16 2005, 08:32 PM
Racer Chris I had a friend sit on the end of the tube and saw ... Dec 16 2005, 08:34 PM
Racer Chris I have several more tests planned already.
1) meas... Dec 16 2005, 08:40 PM
TimT Put the level on the trailing arm, not the lever
... Dec 16 2005, 08:41 PM
TimT and yes I see the angle you have welded on the bo... Dec 16 2005, 08:42 PM
SpecialK ....go on.... http://www.914wor... Dec 16 2005, 08:43 PM
andys Chris,
This is exactly the kind of testing requir... Dec 16 2005, 08:57 PM
goose2 If you mount the level in various locations on the... Dec 16 2005, 09:06 PM
TimT