Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> cool windscreens, how do you make em
usa4cheer
post Feb 16 2006, 06:35 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 29
Joined: 16-February 06
From: richmond, va
Member No.: 5,592



I am working on my grassroots motorsport challenge car and want to take the windshield out of my car and want to do the mini windscreen. How do you make it???
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Mugs914
post Feb 17 2006, 02:57 AM
Post #2


"Hey, yellow IS faster!"
***

Group: Members
Posts: 618
Joined: 22-July 05
From: Temple TEXAS
Member No.: 4,452
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE (skeates @ Feb 16 2006, 11:15 PM)
Andy - you are correct in saying that the frontal area of the car plays a big point in determining its CD, however....

     the curvature of the body in the front plays a very large roll as well. Take for example a Jeep Cherokee vs. a Ferrari Testerosa. The Jeep has a very broad and flat frontal area wich creates a VERY large "stagnation point," meaning that one might as well be trying to run down a windy ravine holding a piece of plywood directly infront of them and perpendicular to the wind. The Testerosa on the other hand takes that plywood and tilts it back so that the airstream from the wind is not directly stopped on account of the plywood, but rather only slowed down. One can test this out on their own by buying a piece of plywood and standing with it in the wind at different orientations (BTW: even if the tilted piece of plywood is longer to make up for the decreased frontal surface area it should still create less drag than the directly perpendicualr piece). This is why the pop-up headlights on the 914 could potentially create more drag than the fender-flairs

Peace,

Steven

Actually, the frontal area of the vehicle doesn't factor into the CD, Though it has everything to do with the overall drag of the vehicle. Steven's second paragraph is a good description of what the CD means.

The CD is a measure of the aerodynamic eficiency (or lack thereof) of a given shape. The CD of a car (or any other shape, for that matter) doesn't change with the size of the object. The CD of the 1973 914 in your driveway is about the same as the CD of the 1/43 914 on your desk. A lower number indicates higher aerodynamic eficiency. Frontal area is factored into the equation seperately. The basic eqation for aerodynamic drag, ignoring compressability, Reynolds effects, etc. is:

Air density x CD x Forntal area x velocity, squared = overall drag

So to reduce drag you can reduce air density (move to the mountains), lower the CD of the shape ("streamlining"), reduce frontal area (sawzall), or slow down (blasphemy...).

Since no-one on this list ever wants to slow down we can eliminate that one...

So if you assume a given speed and air density (it can be tough to change), you are left with two factors that can affect the overall drag of the vehicle. It's shape and it's size.

Though the CD change with the shape of a 914 (.363 all closed up vs. .484 with everything hangin' out. A difference of .121) is pretty significant as far a CD figure goes, if you look at the equation you'll see that even a change that great will not have a huge effect on the overall drag. Lowering the CD usually means a lot of work for very small improvements. As an example, a clear "fastback" rear window over a 914's rear decklid would probably net a reduction of about .015 or so to the CD (that's just a guess. if anyone has seen actual numbers for such a thing let me know!).

That leaves frontal area. For any given change this will have the greatest effect on the overall drag. Besides, its much easier to reduce frontal area than CD! So while removing the windscreen and rear window would increase the CD by as much as a point, the loss of around 5 - 7 square feet of frontal area would mean that the overall drag had been reduced. In the same way the GT flares will add very slightly to the CD of the car, but their major drag penalty comes from an extra two or so square feet of frontal area.

Sometimes it works the other way as well. When Prosche was running the original 908 coupes they installed a raised rooftop on one car to give extra helmet clearance for a tall driver. It turned out that the (very) slight increase in frontal area resulted in a lower CD and a very, very slight decrease in drag.

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/unsure.gif) Sorry to geek out on you guys, didn't mean to go on for pages. Aero is one of my favorite subjects. It's easy for me to ramble on and on about such things.... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/unsure.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
usa4cheer   cool windscreens   Feb 16 2006, 06:35 PM
Jeroen   you can just buy it from most vendors of fibreglas...   Feb 16 2006, 06:44 PM
d914   grassroots has a VERY small budget for building ca...   Feb 16 2006, 08:00 PM
alpha434   2006$ HOLY COW!!! If you can...   Feb 16 2006, 08:25 PM
davep   Why remove the windshield? My friends GT can run e...   Feb 16 2006, 08:32 PM
alpha434   Dave is right. To an extent. You are removing the ...   Feb 16 2006, 09:00 PM
SirAndy   ...   Feb 16 2006, 09:14 PM
one914racer   homemade   Feb 16 2006, 09:34 PM
Twystd1   Thomas.. I love that car.... That sucker is CLEA...   Feb 16 2006, 09:42 PM
alpha434   <...   Feb 16 2006, 09:42 PM
r_towle   So, a custom windscreen. Either you make a foam t...   Feb 16 2006, 11:15 PM
Aaron Cox   <...   Feb 16 2006, 11:28 PM
usa4cheer   WOW what a great response, it would have a taken ...   Feb 16 2006, 11:46 PM
alpha434   You get free weblog space with membership. ...   Feb 17 2006, 12:04 AM
alpha434   1969 Porsche 914/6 - Technical specifications This...   Feb 17 2006, 12:27 AM
Aaron Cox   that goes against everything ive heard.... ...   Feb 17 2006, 12:54 AM
alpha434   My numbers were WITH. That's what I've be...   Feb 17 2006, 12:59 AM
alpha434   Adding fender flares and increasing frontal profil...   Feb 17 2006, 01:00 AM
skeates   I hope that I can shine some light on the aerodyna...   Feb 17 2006, 01:01 AM
SirAndy   ...   Feb 17 2006, 01:02 AM
skeates   Andy - you are correct in saying that the frontal ...   Feb 17 2006, 01:15 AM
messix   i think an open cockpit would creat more drag than...   Feb 17 2006, 01:30 AM
redshift   With no back window, the vortex shit is all differ...   Feb 17 2006, 02:25 AM
Mugs914   <...   Feb 17 2006, 02:57 AM
URY914   Sounds like you guys work for NASA or something   Feb 17 2006, 07:45 AM
skeates   Thanks Mike, Yea, I got my CD mixed up with the e...   Feb 17 2006, 10:12 AM
SirAndy   <...   Feb 17 2006, 11:11 AM
airsix   I enjoyed the posts (such as Mike's) with good...   Feb 17 2006, 03:36 PM
marks914   Here is how you make a cut down windshield: The be...   Feb 17 2006, 03:55 PM
WRX914   if anyone would be willing to part with thier cut ...   Feb 17 2006, 04:00 PM
marks914   Has anyone here actually been in an automotive win...   Feb 17 2006, 08:48 PM
URY914   ...   Feb 17 2006, 09:07 PM
SirAndy   ...   Feb 17 2006, 09:21 PM
J P Stein   No, but I've been in a aeronautical wind tunne...   Feb 17 2006, 09:21 PM
marks914   <...   Feb 17 2006, 10:08 PM
airsix   ...   Feb 18 2006, 02:01 AM
usa4cheer   a guy ran a 914 with 2.3 turbo ford motor last yea...   Feb 18 2006, 02:43 PM
J P Stein  

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th June 2024 - 12:34 PM