Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Type 4 Engine build basics, Best approach on rebuild options
TomL
post Mar 30 2006, 05:15 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Joined: 10-October 04
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 2,916



I am hoping to build a good, solid, higher performance Type 4 which will be used as a daily driver, touring car and perhaps an occasional AX. I have some questions.
1. Are all type 4 engine cases identical? If so, why are "GA" cases preferable?
2. What practical difference is there between a 78.4 stroke crank and an 80mm crank--since the 80mm seems to be more prevalent and a little less expensive?
3. Which is the most preferable bore--94mm, 96mm or 103/4mm?
4. Is there any practical difference between standard 2.0 sized crank journals and chevy sized?
5. Can 1.8 heads be "massaged" enough for decent performance?
6. Pure speculation--What kind of HP might I expect out of an engine with: 80mm stroke, 96mm bore, a moderate cam, re-worked 1.8 heads (8.5 or 9:1CR) and carbs?

Thanks for any answers you can give
TomL

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
DNHunt
post Apr 1 2006, 08:37 AM
Post #2


914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,099
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Member No.: 598



Dave

My 78.4mm DPR crank with type 1 journals needs some clearancing. The webbing at the top of the case has to be clearanced. The case at the top needed to be thinned about a mm and the cam is a reduced base circle. I would have to look up the diameter. The clearance between the crank and cam is approximately 1.5 mm. at it's closest so, I suspect that could be narrowed a bit.

Interestingly, I had 2 cam failures with ceramic lifters (I'm the 1 and only and I want to be in Ripley's). The reason for that was that the ramp rates for that cam grind on a reduced base circle were excessive. We kept the same base circle, took out 0.016" of lift at the intake valve and 0.004" on the exhaust and added 4 degrees of duration. Lift is now just under 1/2". All is now well and I can't tell any difference for sure. I think I can feel the cam come in around 3000 where the other cam was more seemless but who knows. It works now and I'm happy.

At any rate there are limitations with added stroke.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th June 2024 - 09:03 PM