Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 1.8 v 2.0
netwolf232
post Sep 26 2003, 06:01 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 5-September 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 1,113



I have been looking for a 914 now for a couple of months. I have around 4k to spend and I would like to get a nice condition car that I can Autox on the weekends. I don’t need the car to be competitive just as long as its not the slowest car out there. My problem is I have been looking at several publications each day trying to find a 73-74 914 with a 2.0L engine without any luck. I went and looked at a couple but the had too much rust and damage on them. Would I be happy with just a 1.8L? I am not too familiar with how the 914 engines are laid out. Did Porsche use different blocks for the 1.8 and 2.0 or were the bores just different? I am basically looking for a nice looking straight car with a strong engine and tranny. What are the major differences between the engines? Are there any performance possibilities with a 1.8? Should I just keep looking for a 2.0 until I find one that works for me. I am in the San Diego, CA area if anyone knows of any cars that might fit what I am looking for. Thanks for the help.
-Andrew
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Anton
post Sep 28 2003, 05:00 AM
Post #2


Royal Orange
**

Group: Members
Posts: 161
Joined: 25-March 03
From: The Netherlands
Member No.: 473



QUOTE(thesey914 @ Sep 28 2003, 01:46 AM)
Don't think the L jet is too tolerant of lots of overlap.

An aggressive cam might be too much, but a larger displacement of let's say +15% should easily tolerable for an L-jet system. However, you have to adjust the airflow sensor for the larger volume!

Usually, getting more fuel into an engine is not the problem, but getting more air is. A larger displacement, aggressive cam, and some other modifications gets you more air; the fuel will "follow"...

I have a 1.8 L-jet in good condition with ultrasonically cleaned injectors, adjusted airflow sensor, new fuel lines (!!!), high flow cotton air filter, 2.0 exhaust system, and it is a serious 914. It has a standard cam, but FLAT (not dome shaped) Mahle pistons with an increased compression ratio of about 8.5:1... IMPO the only thing better is a TUNED, ie. modified 2.0 engine (larger displacement, aggressive cam with Webers, etc.).

Nevertheless, for AX you probably need something more than a 1.8.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
netwolf232   1.8 v 2.0   Sep 26 2003, 06:01 PM
Jake Raby   All the cases were the same. The combo was changed...   Sep 26 2003, 06:16 PM
Andyrew   too... many... andy/andrew's... AHHHHHHHHHHH...   Sep 26 2003, 06:27 PM
netwolf232   I wish I could find a very nice 2.0 for 4k but the...   Sep 26 2003, 07:45 PM
seanery   I bought my 74 2.0 in LA in 99 for $3800. It...   Sep 26 2003, 08:51 PM
netwolf232   You want to sell it? -Andrew   Sep 26 2003, 10:18 PM
Andyrew   Andrew, Not for sale. Try autotrader, and ebay...   Sep 26 2003, 10:49 PM
Brad Roberts   I like the fact that you cant find a 73 2.0 for un...   Sep 27 2003, 03:48 AM
Curvie Roadlover   <...   Sep 27 2003, 08:24 AM
ArtechnikA     Sep 27 2003, 12:03 PM
thesey914     Sep 27 2003, 12:07 PM
Charles Deutsch  
2270 is 96 mm bore x 78.4 mm stroke. Not sure why ...   Sep 27 2003, 12:11 PM
netwolf232   If i add exhaust and intake to the a 1.8 would tha...   Sep 27 2003, 05:40 PM
swood   It'll help a little, but in answer to your que...   Sep 27 2003, 07:37 PM
thesey914   A decent cam helps loads and wakes up the engine (...   Sep 28 2003, 03:46 AM
Anton   ...   Sep 29 2003, 11:11 PM
jarbuthnot   <...   Oct 1 2003, 02:54 AM
redshift  

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 04:46 AM