Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 916 build on 4-Cyl. chassis?, huh?
SirAndy
post Sep 5 2006, 11:58 PM
Post #1


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 42,257
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



ok, i'm no expert when it comes to 916s, but this is news to me (interesting part in bold):


QUOTE
A supercar version known as the Porsche 916 was planned for production in the early 1970s, but was cancelled after the production of eleven prototypes. These had either the 2.4 engine from the 911S, or the 2.7 from the Carrera: also a fixed steel roof, wider wheels and flared fenders from the GT, complete leather trimmed interior, and more integrated front and rear ends than the 914. Ventilated disc brakes were fitted to all four wheels, and also a "mid-engined" version of the then-new 915 transmission, giving a conventional shift pattern with 1 to 4 in an H and fifth out on a limb. One 916 was built to US spec, and on delivery to the USA was fitted with air conditioning by the dealer (Brumos). One fact that may make 914/6 purists wince is that at least one of the 916's proves, on close examination, to have been built using a 4-cylinder VW-engined 914 as a base. Porsche obviously had a "waste not, want not" attitude to their prototypes that was also evident with the 914/8's.



looking through the 916 VIN number list, they all had 914/6 style VINs, even the first "prototype" ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
John
post Sep 6 2006, 07:55 AM
Post #2


member? what's a member?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,393
Joined: 30-January 04
From: Evansville, IN (SIRPCA)
Member No.: 1,615
Region Association: None



What I read (I still have the old AA catalog and can look it up tonight), was that after GH had bought the one he has, he found a bunch of "interesting" things about the prototype that he had just spent a bunch of money on. One of the things mentioned was that the engine compartment had evidence of once having engine mounts for a 4-cyl. The article also mentioned that the use of a gas axe was evident and that it wasn't done all that neatly. (All completely understandable as it was one of 11 prototype cars). I would be willing to bet that if all were gathered together, there would be some differences between even those 11 cars.

That is what I recall. (It may be wrong, but I can look at it tonight and possibly scan the article if any are all that interested.)

I know nothing about the VIN's and when they were assigned or if they were changed.



just my $0.02
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
SirAndy   916 build on 4-Cyl. chassis?   Sep 5 2006, 11:58 PM
effutuo101   Since you know way more about these cars than I do...   Sep 6 2006, 12:01 AM
Gustl   on the one hand - the quoted text isn't all co...   Sep 6 2006, 01:12 AM
davep   Well, they are not saying the car originally had a...   Sep 6 2006, 07:02 AM
gms   I remember reading this article and yes it was GH...   Sep 6 2006, 07:54 AM
JOHNMAN   What I read (I still have the old AA catalog and c...   Sep 6 2006, 07:55 AM
Root_Werks   I have read that article 100 times over the years....   Sep 6 2006, 08:16 AM
914-8  

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th July 2025 - 03:14 AM