![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
cha914 |
![]()
Post
#1
|
MUSR 8 - 5lug conversion done wed - drive 500miles thrus ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 739 Joined: 31-December 02 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 63 ![]() |
Ok, did the first autox with the new suspension on sunday, and I wasn't overly impressed with the results, but since I changed almost everything, I cant realy expect to have it right the first time.
So here goes, the car had very sluggish turn-in responce, and wanted to plow through every corner. I really couldn't even get it to rotate under trail braking. Here is the setup: Koni Yellows all around Poly bushings all around Fully adj rear perches w/175lb springs 22mm solid torsion bars 22mm weltmeister front bar set full soft Ride height = 4.75 up front and ~5.25 rear (measured to the donuts) Camber = -1.5 up front -2 rear Toe = 1/16th toe OUT up front and 1/16th toe IN rear With the Koni's set to full hard the car seemed to improve a little, but not much. Also, the course was on a fairly slick parking lot, and I am running 2year old pirelli tires (205/50/15s with plenty of tread, just hard). Finally, I want this car setup mostly for track driving, so I know autox performance is going to suffer some, but it seemed pretty poor overall yesterday (it was definately more fun with the ass up in the air sliding everywhere (IMG:style_emoticons/default/tongue.gif) now I want it to be fast) Any suggestions on where to go from here, or what to try in the future (I know I need better tires). Tony (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif) |
![]() ![]() |
DuckRyder |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Avatars Mode: OFF because of the recalcitrant few. ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Benefactors Posts: 767 Joined: 8-January 03 From: Georgia Member No.: 110 ![]() ![]() |
The disclaimer is that this is non-914 specific experience. I like a car tail happy for autocross, it helps a lot in the very low speed boxes that they like to set up. A car I had set up to my liking for autocross would be unsafe on the street and downright treacherous on a road course. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_pokal.gif)
Well, there are definitely two schools of thought on suspension design. The generally European school is heavy springs, stiff shocks, and little or no anti-sway bar. I have seen cars prepared in Europe for SCCA improved touring type of racing which had no anti-sway bars at all. The obvious downside is loss of ride quality. Advocates of this design say that the anti-sway bars defeat the independent suspensions ability to work properly. The generally American school is slightly raised spring rates with good dampers for controlled but not overly stiff spring-shock combinations and BIG anti-sway bars. The obvious advantage is little loss of ride quality. Advocates of this design say that overly stiff springs impair the suspensions ability to react to small imperfections. I find that I generally prefer the bigger sway bar approach, I my opinion it works better on less than perfect surfaces. I also feel it is a generally bad idea to mix the two schools of thought on the same car. Nevertheless, perhaps I should rephrase my previous answer. I think it needs a rear bar OR stiffer rear springs. Again, there are some 914 specific replies so weight them accordingly. (We need a cone smiley) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th May 2025 - 11:04 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |