small 6 vs. big 4, help with the basics... Options

[jonferns]

was considering a 2.7-ish engine for a shell that I have. After reviewing what is necessary, I am starting to think that a big four is sufficient.

what is the normal power output for a 2056, and can that setup run on FI?

looking for something with a bit more power than what we have. Currently have a spare 2.0 out of a '75/'76 sitting in the garage...

thanks! -JON

[Jake Raby]

The 2056 is a potent combo, not as torque filled as the 2270 but easier to make a revver from.

Today one doesn't have to make a 4 "Big" to get insane power, hell a 2270 is only a 10% displacement increase to more than double the stock 2.0 power with equal reliability and longevity as well as runing temps.

I continually preach to enthusiasts not to make the /4 big, keep it at 2316cc or smaller and make the engine efficient. Today our most powerful combinations are based on the 2056,2270 and 2316 platforms.

As we work to get volume up on our product line prices should drop again the beginning of the year on everything except cylinder heads, which will see approximately a 10% cost increase.Our LE Heads are a huge part of how our engines function as efficiently as they dobut also a great factor in the cost of the performance.

In early 08 I plan on doing some further development on an optimized D jet set up much like Dan's engine. With all bolt on parts that will include a Mallory Unilite, air filter housing manipulation and other bolt on tricks that can be purchased in stages and benefit any D jet 914 owner.

Now that more and more people are going the TIV route we can offer more developments at higher volumes at a reduced cost. Volume really is the key.

FYI_ I have an article to release in a few weeks titled "Creating the 914S engine " wich outlines basically what dan and many others have done based on my parts and thoughts. It'll be available on my forums under Jake's technical articles.

This post has been edited by Jake Raby: Oct 8 2007, 01:34 PM