Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> bulkhead vs. quick six mount for conversion, Pros and cons of each?
jaybird840
post Jan 17 2008, 09:11 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 163
Joined: 27-September 06
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 6,927
Region Association: Southwest Region



Hi All,
I'm starting to source the parts for putting a 2.7 into my teener. I'd like to hear the pros and cons of both the bulkhead and the quick six mount. Thanks!
--jaybird
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
John
post Jan 19 2008, 12:43 PM
Post #2


member? what's a member?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,393
Joined: 30-January 04
From: Evansville, IN (SIRPCA)
Member No.: 1,615
Region Association: None



I prefer bulkhead mounts. I prefer to fabricate my own.

I have no wiring harness issues.

(IMG:http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q202/johnflesburg/EngineMount_02a.jpg)
(IMG:http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q202/johnflesburg/EngineMount_01a.jpg)

The "Quick Six" bars cantilever the weight of the engine on a bar that is too weak and flexes continuously.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 03:19 AM