 Web vs Eagle cams |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| MattR |
 Feb 9 2004, 06:33 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member  Group: Members Posts: 3,279 Joined: 23-January 04 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 1,589 Region Association: Northern California  |
Okay, so Im going to tear my 914 apart next weekend and Im ordering parts now so I wont have to wait.
Here is my setup so far: 2.0 L T4 Dual Weber 40s KB 96mm pistons with stock stroke stock intake and exhaust valves stock exhaust and upgraded muffler (PO did this) my questions is for the cams and followers. cbperformance.com has eagle cams and followers for like 100 and 40 respectivly, and webcams are 155 and 140 respectivly. I want to make this a daily driver. Is it worth the extra for the webcam? Or is that just a bunch of hype. And, which grind do you suggest? If I do go with web, I was thinking the 494 cut. Are eagle cams good quality? Or is it worth the insurance for web. |
   |
 
|
Posts in this topic
MattR Web vs Eagle cams Feb 9 2004, 06:33 PM
seanery I've got the 494. It's worth 50 bucks IMHO... Feb 9 2004, 06:35 PM seanery I got my cam & lifters elsewhere cheaper and they ... Feb 9 2004, 06:40 PM MattR Thanks for the quick response! My concern was... Feb 9 2004, 06:44 PM Brad Roberts The 103's will require machining the case for ... Feb 9 2004, 11:51 PM
Jake Raby The 494 is a good cam if you are not concerned wit... Feb 10 2004, 09:27 AM  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th May 2024 - 03:58 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.