Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Vacuum routing questions, 1975 1.8 L - EGR valve or no?
mpoffers
post Dec 25 2009, 07:18 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 15-September 08
From: Portland, OR
Member No.: 9,551
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I just finished replacing the fuel lines on my 1975 1.8L, and now I am elbows deep in new vacuum lines. My question is about my EGR valve.

Do I need one?

The diagram from Pelican shows an EGR valve and related hoses. The diagram that came with my hose kit from AutoAtlanta does not show an EGR valve, but seems to contain hoses for it. My car does not have an EGR valve, but instead leaves one of the ports on the throttle body and the distributor open. My car also does not have the metal EGR line, and the the oil fill port connects directly to the throttle body snorkle. What's right?

Also, while I'm in there, can I bypass the charcoal cannister?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 4)
zonedoubt
post Dec 25 2009, 08:32 PM
Post #2


Canadian Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 668
Joined: 14-May 03
From: Vancouver, BC
Member No.: 696
Region Association: Canada



If you think your local emissions tester will look for the EGR then I would install it and plumb it in. Or you may just want it for originality sake. The car will run fine without it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mpoffers
post Dec 25 2009, 09:08 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 15-September 08
From: Portland, OR
Member No.: 9,551
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



OK, so I don't need the EGR. Should I just cap off the extra ports on the distributor and throttle body?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
zonedoubt
post Dec 25 2009, 11:14 PM
Post #4


Canadian Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 668
Joined: 14-May 03
From: Vancouver, BC
Member No.: 696
Region Association: Canada



Here's a thread on disconnecting the EGR: http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...mp;#entry766064
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
75914-L20C
post Dec 26 2009, 09:45 AM
Post #5


It isn't what you drive, but how you drive that counts.
**

Group: Members
Posts: 57
Joined: 29-November 05
From: MN, USA
Member No.: 5,204
Region Association: Upper MidWest



The Pelican diagram is for a '75 1.8 with California emissions. Sounds like yours is a "49 state" model and did not come with an EGR valve. The oil filler hose should connect directly to the intake boot. I'm not sure if the 49 state models came with a different distributor vacuum advance or not. If it has two ports, connect the "rearward" port to the "rearward" port on the throttle body (remove the Tee shown in the Pelican diagram and use a single piece of vacuum hose).

Pete Klager
'75 914 1.8L
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th May 2024 - 03:20 PM