Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Weight ratio's, Whats heavyer.. the rear or the front?
Andyrew
post Mar 29 2004, 06:49 PM
Post #1


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



Whats the weight ratio for the 914? 49% front 51% rear? Or what?

Andrew
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Mar 29 2004, 06:50 PM
Post #2


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



depends on how much gas. 46/54 is what comes to mind.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Mar 29 2004, 06:53 PM
Post #3


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,544
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



I weighed my car and figured out the ratio back to front but it didn't add up to 100%. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)

Maybe my car is special, (IMG:style_emoticons/default/w00t.gif)

I think 49/51 is right if I remember correctly.

Ask Dave D., he knows all this kinda stuff

Paul
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
physician
post Mar 29 2004, 07:14 PM
Post #4


still looking for a teener....
**

Group: Members
Posts: 86
Joined: 19-March 04
From: quebec
Member No.: 1,819



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) probably that famous unsprung weight (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SLITS
post Mar 29 2004, 07:27 PM
Post #5


"This Utah shit is HARSH!"
**********

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 13,602
Joined: 22-February 04
From: SoCal Mountains ...
Member No.: 1,696
Region Association: None



Depends on how heavy your ass is when you sit in it.

(IMG:http://www.rccauto.com/test/bigass.jpg)Mike Z ain't got nutin on this one!

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Mar 29 2004, 07:36 PM
Post #6


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,544
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



We had a girl in HS that had an ass that big and drove a Spitfire. We use to say she didn't get in it, she put it on. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Mar 29 2004, 07:42 PM
Post #7


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



So, weight needs to come off the rear for better balance.. correct?

Andrew
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Mar 29 2004, 07:46 PM
Post #8


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,544
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



QUOTE
So, weight needs to come off the rear for better balance.. correct


Do you mean a 914 or the fat ass pictured above?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jridder
post Mar 29 2004, 08:00 PM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 136
Joined: 5-May 03
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Member No.: 656



>So, weight needs to come off the rear for better balance.. correct?

If by better balance, you mean that you want to be able to stick a pipe under the mid point between the front and rear wheels and have the car balance then yes. If you are referring to having the car handle, brake or accelerate better then no.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ArtechnikA
post Mar 29 2004, 08:19 PM
Post #10


rich herzog
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,390
Joined: 4-April 03
From: Salted Roads, PA
Member No.: 513
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Andyrew @ Mar 29 2004, 05:42 PM)
So, weight needs to come off the rear for better balance.. correct?

only if you have that rare all-wheel-drive 914...

ask yourself how many races the 917-30 lost with its 33/67 weight distribution...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mskala
post Mar 29 2004, 09:37 PM
Post #11


R
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,925
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Massachusetts
Member No.: 79
Region Association: None



My -6 measured almost right at 45/55.

The -4 will be closer to 50/50 but not by all that much.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
smg914
post Mar 29 2004, 10:03 PM
Post #12


Sahara Beige Steve
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 22-February 04
From: Tampa, FL
Member No.: 1,695
Region Association: None



Stock '73 2 Liter weight distribution, 46.3% front and 53.7% rear
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john rogers
post Mar 29 2004, 10:10 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,525
Joined: 4-March 03
From: Chula Vista CA
Member No.: 391



Remember that is static weight. What happens when the car is going 120 or 130 and you have a spoiler on the front pushing down or a wing on the back pushing down or nothing on the back and that vacuum behind the rear window is trying to suck the car upwards??!! Also a factor is what type of driving or racing is it, a tight auto-x course or a long track such as Willow Springs or CA Speedway where you are on the rev limiter by the start-finish line? Finally, most people don't know what the wheelbase of a 914 is and since it is pretty long some weight in the rear is an advantage I would think. Since I made the six conversion, mine seems to actually turn better in sharp corners than before with the four.....and is more stable at full speed at the CA Speedway turns one and two.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Mar 29 2004, 10:15 PM
Post #14


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



Alright guys.. geez, dont bite my head off (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

Im was just wondering if it was better to take weight off the front or the rear.. Ie Fiberglass hoods, bumpers.. stuff like that.


Andrew
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Mar 29 2004, 10:16 PM
Post #15


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



John nailed it.

Dont think of the car as if it where sitting on the scales all the time and not moving. When you hit the brakes the car can go 60/40 real quick. I personally want a 40/60 car so the car is balanced under braking and not 80/20 or 20/80 under braking. Basically I want a car that feels stable and not all squirrely under braking.


B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jeroen
post Mar 30 2004, 07:14 AM
Post #16


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,887
Joined: 24-December 02
From: The Netherlands
Member No.: 3
Region Association: Europe



So basically what you guys are saying is that you want a 911 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

cheers,

Jeroen
(ducking for cover)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Mar 30 2004, 07:42 AM
Post #17


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



except when you hit the brakes in a turn.....ouch!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KenH
post Mar 30 2004, 10:21 AM
Post #18


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 680
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Gilroy, CA
Member No.: 156



914-4, Roll Bars, Full Gas Tank, 200# Driver

Front = 1040# 44.5%

Rear = 1292# 55.4%

Corner = 50%

Ken
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
maf914
post Mar 30 2004, 12:06 PM
Post #19


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



QUOTE(ArtechnikA @ Mar 29 2004, 06:19 PM)
ask yourself how many races the 917-30 lost with its 33/67 weight distribution...

I saw Mark Donohue in the Sunoco 917/30 lose to George Follmer in the RC Cola 917/10 at Road Atlanta. Of course Donohue had a problem, tire failure I think, while leading, but he did lose. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
maf914
post Mar 30 2004, 12:12 PM
Post #20


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Jeroen @ Mar 30 2004, 05:14 AM)
So basically what you guys are saying is that you want a 911 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

cheers,

Jeroen
(ducking for cover)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) There is weight distribution and there is moment of inertia, not to be confused. The latter is what gets the tail draggers into trouble.

Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th May 2024 - 02:55 AM