Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> MegaSquirt trigger wheel sensor solution, What's your design??
draganc
post Aug 30 2010, 11:16 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 725
Joined: 2-November 09
From: central new jersey
Member No.: 11,000
Region Association: North East States



Hi guys!

I’m planning to upgrade my D-jet system on a 75 2.0 (2056) with a MegaSquirt system.

I’m still debating how to mount the trigger-wheel-sensor and would like to see some of your solutions.

Thank you for your input,
Dragan
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Aug 30 2010, 11:24 PM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



My design is available here.

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads/post-419-1244942673.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
hcdmueller
post Aug 31 2010, 01:55 AM
Post #3


?????????????
***

Group: Members
Posts: 542
Joined: 4-February 06
From: UK
Member No.: 5,527
Region Association: England



I bought the McMark trigger wheel. It fits perfectly and the sensor mount is easy to position. I probably could have cobbled something together but it would have cost more and not been nearly as well made.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SLKWrx
post Aug 31 2010, 06:57 AM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 317
Joined: 28-September 04
From: Woolwich, NJ
Member No.: 2,845
Region Association: North East States



I've got the same setup and the fit/finish is perfect. Very reasonable as well.

Quick side track, how did you guys plug the distributor hole?

-- Steve
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
draganc
post Aug 31 2010, 07:36 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 725
Joined: 2-November 09
From: central new jersey
Member No.: 11,000
Region Association: North East States



I will go with Van's design (2nd pic from the top) for the plugging the dist. hole:

http://www.ephotomotion.com/914engine/page36.html

BTW, he has done excellent job with this webpage.

Mark, can you pls send me a close-up pic of the final sensor mount? I read you other post and was wondering if the mount shown is/was your final design.

Thanks,
Dragan
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Aug 31 2010, 09:58 AM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



The only change in the final sensor mount is that it uses round tube, instead of square tube.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
draganc
post Aug 31 2010, 02:11 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 725
Joined: 2-November 09
From: central new jersey
Member No.: 11,000
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(McMark @ Aug 31 2010, 07:58 AM) *

The only change in the final sensor mount is that it uses round tube, instead of square tube.


Thanks Mark! Do you have them in stock?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Aug 31 2010, 03:08 PM
Post #8


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



My newest shipment of wheels is shipping right now. So they are 'backorder' with an expected ship date of next week.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 31 2010, 03:20 PM
Post #9


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,857
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



We took a new 009 distributor and designed a pickup for it. Works perfectly but very expensive as we had to machine parts to make this functional and reliable. the best thing though is that it uses the original distributor hole so there is no need to machine anything nor drop the engine
Mcmarks is a very economical solution.

QUOTE(draganc @ Aug 30 2010, 10:16 PM) *

Hi guys!

I’m planning to upgrade my D-jet system on a 75 2.0 (2056) with a MegaSquirt system.

I’m still debating how to mount the trigger-wheel-sensor and would like to see some of your solutions.

Thank you for your input,
Dragan

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
draganc
post Aug 31 2010, 03:45 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 725
Joined: 2-November 09
From: central new jersey
Member No.: 11,000
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(dr914@autoatlanta.com @ Aug 31 2010, 01:20 PM) *

We took a new 009 distributor and designed a pickup for it. Works perfectly but very expensive as we had to machine parts to make this functional and reliable. the best thing though is that it uses the original distributor hole so there is no need to machine anything nor drop the engine
Mcmarks is a very economical solution.


What is "very expensive"?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
underthetire
post Aug 31 2010, 03:48 PM
Post #11


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,062
Joined: 7-October 08
From: Brentwood
Member No.: 9,623
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(draganc @ Aug 31 2010, 02:45 PM) *

QUOTE(dr914@autoatlanta.com @ Aug 31 2010, 01:20 PM) *

We took a new 009 distributor and designed a pickup for it. Works perfectly but very expensive as we had to machine parts to make this functional and reliable. the best thing though is that it uses the original distributor hole so there is no need to machine anything nor drop the engine
Mcmarks is a very economical solution.


What is "very expensive"?


Ya, inquiring minds want to know. I'd love to put my MS back to fuel and spark. The point pickup (or electronic) sucked for it during start.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 31 2010, 03:55 PM
Post #12


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,857
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



here is a picture:Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 31 2010, 04:01 PM
Post #13


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,857
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



we had all kinds of problems modifying both the flywheel and the fan to install the pickups and NONE were reliable. Plus there was an empty distributor hole AND the fact that to install the megasquirt pickup, the home enthusiast would have to drop the engine, or at least the transmission! What a hassle as compared to just installing a set of carbs. That is why I had my brother in law Galen, an ex GA Tech physics nut case and Porsche perfectionist, design and machine this assembly for us. As you can see by the cover it is very custom and just the one off parts a few at a time take a bunch of precise hours to make.
BUT the result is a direct drop in part that works perfectly and plugs right in, plugging the hole while using it for a modern trigger
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RJMII
post Aug 31 2010, 04:01 PM
Post #14


Jim McIntosh
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,125
Joined: 11-September 07
From: Sandy, Utah
Member No.: 8,112
Region Association: None



McMark's also turns at the rate of the crank... Does MS adjust for cam input to run both fuel and spark?

I'm running something simliar to what Mark has done, only with the V6.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Aug 31 2010, 04:05 PM
Post #15


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



I am doing some MS test work now.. I ended up using an electromotive 60-2 toothed wheel and electromotive sensor to do the job.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 31 2010, 04:08 PM
Post #16


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,857
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



QUOTE(RJMII @ Aug 31 2010, 03:01 PM) *

McMark's also turns at the rate of the crank... Does MS adjust for cam input to run both fuel and spark?

I'm running something simliar to what Mark has done, only with the V6.


our system combines sds electronics with cb performance hardware with our distributor
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RJMII
post Aug 31 2010, 04:14 PM
Post #17


Jim McIntosh
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,125
Joined: 11-September 07
From: Sandy, Utah
Member No.: 8,112
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Aug 31 2010, 04:05 PM) *

I am doing some MS test work now.. I ended up using an electromotive 60-2 toothed wheel and electromotive sensor to do the job.



Which MS setup? Did you get your hands on the new MS-III ?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dr914@autoatlanta.com
post Aug 31 2010, 05:20 PM
Post #18


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,857
Joined: 3-January 07
From: atlanta georgia
Member No.: 7,418
Region Association: None



Jake is the man for all of this stuff. I am excited to have him try our distributor and see what he thinks about it. THEN maybe we can have a tete a tete going with two brilliant minds, Jake and Galen!!!!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JamesM
post Aug 31 2010, 06:11 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,900
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Kearns, UT
Member No.: 5,834
Region Association: Intermountain Region



QUOTE(underthetire @ Aug 31 2010, 01:48 PM) *

Ya, inquiring minds want to know. I'd love to put my MS back to fuel and spark. The point pickup (or electronic) sucked for it during start.


Some advice on using spark control with a distributor pickup…

When using the point pickup for ignition control with Megasquirt it is VERY important that your "cranking speed" variable be set correctly to have decent starts, ie. set to what your engine is actually cranking at. Technically all your variables need to be set correctly but I find this one to be overlooked and it can cause lots of problems.

Just guessing at this or going off specs in a book is not good enough, you need to disconnect the ignition and crank the engine for a bit to see what Megasquirt is reading the exact RPMs at and use that for your cranking speed value. If it bounces around a bit chose a value in the middle or on the lower end of what you are seeing. You may also want to delay ignition events for a cycle or two at start to allow the engine to get up to this speed.

When using the points pickup Megasquirt does a time calculation based on engine speed to decide when to fire the spark. The distributor pickup does not give enough sensor events (or any for that matter) to calculate engine speed for itself by the time the first ignition event occurs so it needs to have a proper cranking speed variable given to it to get the timing right on startup. Getting this wrong, or just leaving set to whatever default value it had, and you wind up with an engine that has a hard time starting, wont start at all, or maybe even give yourself a flywheel with broken teeth from kickback against the starter.

Think about it, if Megasquirt thinks your engine is spinning at 200rpm when cranking and you are actually only getting 150rpm it is thinking your engine is running 25% FASTER THEN IT ACTUALLY IS! Now think about where a 25% discrepancy in your timing would put your spark.

Correctly set cranking speed makes a world of difference when starting!

Of course if you are willing to put in the extra time and money, crank sensors are the way to go.




Another issue you could be having with starting is a weak tach signal due to how the tach input circuit on your MS was set up (usually when people mod them to filter noise), but I won’t get into that here.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JamesM
post Aug 31 2010, 06:21 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,900
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Kearns, UT
Member No.: 5,834
Region Association: Intermountain Region



I had an idea for something similar to this but unfortinatly i lack the manufacturing resources at this point in time to accomplish it.

I wanted to put it where the d-jet injector triggers go though in order to pull the tach signal though a stock wiring harness.

I think i have seen an aftermarket wasted spark setup for VW's that uses a similar sensor on top of the distributor setup to the one you have come up with. I will have to see if i can locate it.


QUOTE(dr914@autoatlanta.com @ Aug 31 2010, 01:20 PM) *

We took a new 009 distributor and designed a pickup for it. Works perfectly but very expensive as we had to machine parts to make this functional and reliable. the best thing though is that it uses the original distributor hole so there is no need to machine anything nor drop the engine
Mcmarks is a very economical solution.

QUOTE(draganc @ Aug 30 2010, 10:16 PM) *

Hi guys!

I’m planning to upgrade my D-jet system on a 75 2.0 (2056) with a MegaSquirt system.

I’m still debating how to mount the trigger-wheel-sensor and would like to see some of your solutions.

Thank you for your input,
Dragan


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th May 2024 - 06:10 AM