Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Intake/Plennum Joint Hoses, to clamp or not to clamp
Russ K
post Apr 16 2003, 09:57 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 7-April 03
From: SF peninsula, CA
Member No.: 535



Do most of you run clamps on the Air intake/plennum joint hoses? I was always told it was a tight enough without em but i've seen various under-hood pictures on this site that show otherwise. Just curious if anyones had serious problems in that area.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 8)
Brad Roberts
post Apr 16 2003, 10:22 PM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



They are tight enough for the first 20 years. I lock them down when I'm trying to diagnose a problem and I dont have new ones laying around. Its pretty easy to slap a hose clamp on them while they are on the car.

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Curvie Roadlover
post Apr 17 2003, 05:18 AM
Post #3


Two trunks are better than one!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,025
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Southeast Michigan
Member No.: 42



Last car: no clamps, no leaks
Current car: no clamps, no leaks
HTH
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sechszylinder
post Apr 17 2003, 05:44 AM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 247
Joined: 9-April 03
From: /earth/europe/germany/berlin
Member No.: 545
Region Association: None



I use clamps, cause I can feel absolutely confident that there will be no air leak and clamps are pretty cheap.

benno
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Curvie Roadlover
post Apr 17 2003, 08:05 AM
Post #5


Two trunks are better than one!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,025
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Southeast Michigan
Member No.: 42



Good point!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
efrenv
post Apr 17 2003, 08:27 AM
Post #6


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 11-February 03
From: Claremont, California
Member No.: 297



Yes, did the same thing as Benno mentioned. More for peace of mind and the clamps are cheap anyway.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Apr 17 2003, 09:57 AM
Post #7


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



How many of you knew that the 9146 had almost NO hose clamps on the car ANYWHERE ??

None on the fuel tank... none in the engine compartment...

I guess Porsche didnt feel the need to run clamps with such low pressure. I have pulled out 3 different tanks now (out of 914/6's) and none of them had clamps on the tank and several of them didnt have clamps on the carbs. Makes sense. Low pressure... tight fitting hose...


B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisReale
post Apr 17 2003, 11:12 AM
Post #8


Sleazy
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,665
Joined: 20-January 03
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 176



I have two clamps on my AAR hoses. For piece of mind, probably dont need them...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Russ K
post Apr 17 2003, 08:52 PM
Post #9


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 7-April 03
From: SF peninsula, CA
Member No.: 535



Thanks all for the input.

Thats pretty crazy about the 914-6.
But when you think about it, are you really that surprised? These are the same guys that didnt put any zinc on the steel and used the spare tire to power the washer jets. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/huh.gif)

(i was gonna add the fact that the 914-6 didnt have a moving passenger seat to that list as well... but frankly i've always liked the non-moving passenger seat, myself. ..it just makes sense. Why the hell would you need it to move?)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2024 - 06:00 AM