Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Performance Isky Cam, establishing valve lash setting
Joseph Mills
post Aug 25 2004, 01:26 PM
Post #1


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



Why do "performance" cams with greater lift/duration specify greater valve lash? Is it a performance gain, or durability, longevity gain?

I just recently received the cam specs for my engine from the PO. It shows valve clearance should be set at:

.013N
.015X

This just seems really loose! Is this for very high rpm?

The engine is a 75 2.0 with 44IDF's, Euro P/C's, Mallory dizzy & CD, and has Iskendarian cam, lifters, pushrods & springs.

I just recently had some headwork done and replaced the valves. Should I use the above specs instead of .006/.008?


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 8)
SLITS
post Aug 25 2004, 02:03 PM
Post #2


"This Utah shit is HARSH!"
**********

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 13,602
Joined: 22-February 04
From: SoCal Mountains ...
Member No.: 1,696
Region Association: None



1. Since you are producing more heat, the expansion of components is greater.

2. Since the opening and closing ramps, lift, etc are more severe, the lash is opened up.

3. Yes, it is normal - On our full-race cams we were setting 0.018 +/- 0.002
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joseph Mills
post Aug 25 2004, 02:17 PM
Post #3


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



So I presume the valves will be VERY noisy when cold, but subside somewhat once they become warm?

Should I plan on adjusting the valves more frequently than 3k? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

Any other considerations?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SLITS
post Aug 25 2004, 03:38 PM
Post #4


"This Utah shit is HARSH!"
**********

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 13,602
Joined: 22-February 04
From: SoCal Mountains ...
Member No.: 1,696
Region Association: None



They are gonna make more noise. Adjustment intervals will be trial and error - you might start by checking them at 1000 mile intervals and see how they hold adjustment.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joseph Mills
post Aug 25 2004, 04:22 PM
Post #5


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



Thanks Ron.

I'm doing them now.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Aug 25 2004, 07:52 PM
Post #6


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



That lash is way too much!

What material are your pushrods made of?? Are they steel or aluminum?

If they are stock, or aluminum set those valves to .006 on the intake and exhaust when cold.

If they are steel set them to ZERO LASH when cold!! Isky must be high giving settings like that! Thats insane!

As the engine heats up steel pushrods stay the same length and the engine grows around them creating lash- more than enough lash.

BTW, valves should only need to be set every 6K miles, not every 3K. Only hot running engines need the valves set that often
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
seanery
post Aug 25 2004, 07:58 PM
Post #7


waiting to rebuild whitey!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 15,852
Joined: 7-January 03
From: Indy
Member No.: 100
Region Association: None



I thought you were fishing!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Aug 25 2004, 08:10 PM
Post #8


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



I'm leaving in the mornin'......
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joseph Mills
post Aug 25 2004, 09:01 PM
Post #9


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Aug 25 2004, 07:52 PM)
That lash is way too much!

What material are your pushrods made of?? Are they steel or aluminum?

If they are steel set them to ZERO LASH when cold!! Isky must be high giving settings like that! Thats insane!

Thanks for your viewpoint Jake.

They "looked" like steel when they were out (very smooth bright chrome looking ends - but very light. I should have put a magnet on them. The cam, lifters, pushrods & springs are Isky.

It seems like a radical setting to me - I set them and they are REALLY loud, even when the engine warmed up.

Just for clarification, I will get the catalogue that gives those specs, scan it and post it here. Maybe something can be learned from this.

Any other opinions?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th May 2024 - 01:25 PM