Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> battery tray and 914-6 conversion, adding a 3.2
worn
post Jul 30 2012, 03:05 PM
Post #1


can't remember
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,156
Joined: 3-June 11
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 13,152
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I am in the process of welding up the trouble areas in the engine bay in preparation for a 3.2 conversion. I removed the engine mount supports, and then the rusted longitudinal sections underneath, so the battery tray is currently in the scrap heap. I would like to cut out the suspension ears because they keep catching my back as I bend under, but will stop short of that (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif) . But it occurs to me that I need not necessarily want to replace the battery in the original place. My 911 for example carries its battery in the nose, neatly counter weighting the AC compressor that isn't currently there.

Also, a battery in the stock 914 location might be a bit in the way with the 3.2.

So, what is the preferred location? Stock? Or, moved.

BTW. Are there any other things that I am better off without such as the MPS bracket or the relay box holder? I am hoping to gain from your experiences.
Thanks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Jul 30 2012, 03:56 PM
Post #2


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,276
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



You can put it anywhere. Front, back, I've even seen it in the passenger compartment. But I'm going stock. Doesn't take up trunk space,short cables, looks good, it should fit in a normal 3.2 conversion and it - theoretically- offsets some driver weight.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ellisor3
post Jul 31 2012, 08:17 AM
Post #3


HPWhore
***

Group: Members
Posts: 811
Joined: 23-October 08
From: Fleming Island, Florida
Member No.: 9,683
Region Association: South East States



I decided to leave mine in the stock location, will fit fine w/3.2 and you don't have to go to multiple places if you need to disconnect it. I did remove the rain tray. You can see some pictures of it if you click on the Signature.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2024 - 03:13 AM