Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V « < 3 4 5  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Did someone say 914 rear hollow swaybar?, I considering building them.
Ira Ramin
post Feb 17 2005, 01:06 AM
Post #81


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 4-February 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 237



Trekkor,
The bar mounts in a different position, about 3” forward. I figured that was no big deal since most cars don’t have factory brackets anyways. Thanks for offering to help with testing. I wish that I had built three sets, but I only built two and they’re already spoken for. I’ll definitely keep you in mind if things don’t work out with them, or for the next batch.

Andy,
I will probably be doing a version that could be mounted in the trunk. It may only consist of changing to a longer drop link, possibly the one that I use on the front swaybar. Keep in mind that it will need more than just a hole in the floor for the drop link. It will need a long slot to allow for the adjustment. Hopefully I will end up with a design that will work good without needing to be mounted in the trunk.

Brad,
The bar is on its way to the shop for Bill’s car.

Chris,
What do you think about mounting the bar below the transmission and connecting the drop link the way you did? It would probably solve the possible binding and clearance issues, and the geometry might be a little better than your current setup. It would be similar to my rear 911 design. Figuring out what to mount the bearing blocks to would be a little bit of a challenge.

Ira
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TravisNeff
post Feb 17 2005, 04:56 PM
Post #82


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 20-March 03
From: Mesa, AZ
Member No.: 447
Region Association: Southwest Region



Since the dogbone/tranny mount seems to be a bit of an obstacle, what if you reverse positioned the bar, not upside down - but turn it around.

Something like this: obviously the pillow blocks would need to be further inward due to the rear shock mount cutouts, hell it is an idea...


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TravisNeff
post Feb 17 2005, 04:58 PM
Post #83


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 20-March 03
From: Mesa, AZ
Member No.: 447
Region Association: Southwest Region



Also, since the bars up an down movement is in unisyn (sort of) with the shock and control arm, I don't know how there would be an interference with the rear shocks. As long as there is X amount of room away from them, that X should always stay the same, no?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ira Ramin
post Feb 18 2005, 12:51 AM
Post #84


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 4-February 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 237



Travis,
Your sketch has the best geometry of any of the designs but I think that the engine or the starter may be in the way. I think we considered mounting that way, but it’s definitely worth taking another look. We’ll be installing the prototype on Saturday morning and will try to take a fresh look at the other possibilities.

I see what you’re saying about clearing the shocks, it makes sense.

Ira
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Feb 18 2005, 05:49 AM
Post #85


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,934
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



If you made long mounting blocks to position the bar beneath the tranny (at the back) you still have exhaust interference issues to deal with (except with the Tangerine header), as well as worker access issues. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/sad.gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TravisNeff
post Feb 18 2005, 09:50 AM
Post #86


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 20-March 03
From: Mesa, AZ
Member No.: 447
Region Association: Southwest Region



Should be no problems with engine interference, but I didn't think about the starter. that'll be a tight fit.

Or you could do a through body one (like the front) but have it in the trunk going through the walls of the rear strut mounts, obviously you would need longer and doglegged arms for clearance.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

5 Pages V « < 3 4 5
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th June 2024 - 08:37 AM