Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 1.8 to 2.0 engine conversion, What's required and tips for the job
-JR-
post Dec 4 2004, 09:20 PM
Post #1


Life goes faster at 150MPH
**

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 12-May 04
From: Victoria BC Canada
Member No.: 2,055



Hey guys, I'm a new 914 owner and have been a 914 "wanter" for some time. I bought a car that I knew needed engine work but it had a great body!

So now I am looking at the engine work and I am thinking up upgrading my EV case 1.8L engine to a 2.0.

I've never worked on a air cooled motor before and from what I gather this conversion is pretty straight forward. However, having said that I'm not convinced that it's as easy as just buying larger pistons and cylinders.

Can someone please spell out for me all the parts that are different from a 1.8 to a 2.0L engine if there isn't too much? I'd really appreciate it!

I did search the forum and didn't find any topic covering this.


-JR-
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
qa1142
post Dec 4 2004, 09:25 PM
Post #2


Whiplash
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,514
Joined: 1-June 04
From: Lake Zurich, Illinois
Member No.: 2,140



Good question, I am starting same project
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rhodes71/914
post Dec 4 2004, 09:36 PM
Post #3


Glacier
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,374
Joined: 8-August 04
From: End of the Road, Alaska
Member No.: 2,482



Are you going to use carbs or FI?

Oh and Welcome, you have come to the right place.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
-JR-
post Dec 4 2004, 10:00 PM
Post #4


Life goes faster at 150MPH
**

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 12-May 04
From: Victoria BC Canada
Member No.: 2,055



It's got dual webbers on it right now actually. Someone converted it in the past. I'll have to check the cam once I get it appart to see if they also changed that.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Dec 4 2004, 10:30 PM
Post #5


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



cranks are different

66mm for 1.7/1.8

71mm for 2.0

rods are different

heads are different (2.0 heads a little better, but tend to crack more often)

pistons and cylinders are different


you can add larger pistons and cylinders to your existing engine...the most common would increase it to a 1911, but it'll still be a short stroke engine
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bondo
post Dec 4 2004, 11:10 PM
Post #6


Practicing my perpendicular parking
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,277
Joined: 19-April 03
From: Los Osos, CA
Member No.: 587
Region Association: Central California



Shameless plug:

My classified ad for 2.0 engine parts

I see you already found it JR (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

As far as I have been told, all these parts are the same as a 914 2.0 except the pistons (dished instead of flat) and the heads (same as a 1.8 914)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
-JR-
post Dec 5 2004, 02:15 AM
Post #7


Life goes faster at 150MPH
**

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 12-May 04
From: Victoria BC Canada
Member No.: 2,055



Would anyone know if you can put the 2L pistons on 1.8L rods? I've heard the 2L rods are different, but I'm not sure if it's just the length or if it's also the bearing surfaces too. I just want to give my old 1.8 a little more of a kick without spending a bundle as I start my 6cyl project in about a year.

Thanks!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Dec 5 2004, 02:31 AM
Post #8


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Building a 1911 would be the cheap route. You could leave the bottom end together, but as you mentioned, the cam is unknown. It's most likely stock. It's not a very good cam for carbs, but it'll still work fairly well. You're probably looking at about $1000 for new pistons and cylinders and some head work (new guides, etc).

If you want to do a 2.0 it's probably best to do a 2056. That's 96mm pistons instead of 94mm. Because you'd have to buy the crank and rods (you can't use the 1.8 rods) and because you'll have to split the case which means a new cam it'll probably run you $2500 to $3000 for that upgrade.

So the 1911 is the cheap easy route because it's just new pistons and cylinders and rebuilt heads. It'll be a blast. Add a cam and really fly.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
-JR-
post Dec 5 2004, 03:46 AM
Post #9


Life goes faster at 150MPH
**

Group: Members
Posts: 276
Joined: 12-May 04
From: Victoria BC Canada
Member No.: 2,055



QUOTE(markd@mac.com @ Dec 5 2004, 12:31 AM)
Building a 1911 would be the cheap route. You could leave the bottom end together, but as you mentioned, the cam is unknown. It's most likely stock. It's not a very good cam for carbs, but it'll still work fairly well. You're probably looking at about $1000 for new pistons and cylinders and some head work (new guides, etc).

If you want to do a 2.0 it's probably best to do a 2056. That's 96mm pistons instead of 94mm. Because you'd have to buy the crank and rods (you can't use the 1.8 rods) and because you'll have to split the case which means a new cam it'll probably run you $2500 to $3000 for that upgrade.

So the 1911 is the cheap easy route because it's just new pistons and cylinders and rebuilt heads. It'll be a blast. Add a cam and really fly.

Unfortunetly the bottom end is the reason for the work. The car was a recovered stolen vehicle. Someone has run the bag off it and I think it needs rod bearings and I'm not sure what else at this point. I am really hoping I can just slap on some 2L pistons and cylinders just by them themselves. I've got a line on parts to do just that from a few locations. I can do all the work myself and I've set a $300 rough budget for myself because it's not worth me spending anymore on the motor then I can sell it for. I'll be selling the motor and transaxle from this car in about a year, so as long as it still runs ok by then, that's all I'm looking to do. Of course though, if I can squeeze a little more "Kikky-pop" out of it until then and keep around the same budget; well all the better!

Thanks!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Dec 5 2004, 11:24 AM
Post #10


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE
I am really hoping I can just slap on some 2L pistons and cylinders just by them themselves.


the diameter of the 1.8 p/cs are the same as the 2.0 pistons and cylinders, so you gain nothing, it would still be a 1.8......but due to the different location of the piston pins on the 1.8s and the 2.0 motors, this would not work at all....the compression would be so low that the motor might not even start
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
qa1142
post Dec 5 2004, 11:32 AM
Post #11


Whiplash
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,514
Joined: 1-June 04
From: Lake Zurich, Illinois
Member No.: 2,140



Not true.

1.8L is 93mm bore and 2.0L is 94mm bore.

Just fyi, I just went and bought a 2.0 to change mine. With the gain of HP due to the 2.0L 3 stud heads is the main reason to do the swap.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Dec 5 2004, 11:48 AM
Post #12


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE(qa1142 @ Dec 5 2004, 10:32 AM)
Not true.

1.8L is 93mm bore and 2.0L is 94mm bore.

Just fyi, I just went and bought a 2.0 to change mine. With the gain of HP due to the 2.0L 3 stud heads is the main reason to do the swap.

1mm is close enough (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

they still won't work......maybe it's the OD of the cylinders that is the same (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif)

a "true" 2.0 is nice due to the extra torque the longer stroke gives you and the few extra HP the 2.0 heads give you (8 to 10 hp or something like that)

I have a 1911 with 2.0 heads, nice motor, but it's coming apart so that I can sell the heads with the rest of the correct 2.0 block...easier to sell a complete engine (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th May 2024 - 01:45 PM